JcMack
Member
Ask yourself what features you really need on the pistol. Do you really need that ambidextrous thumb safety, the Commander-style hammer, the beavertail grip safety, speed (three-hole) trigger, the Novak-style sights, and all the rest of the gee-gaws that are so ubiquitous on 1911s these days? These doo-dads were all added so that the factories could muscle in on the after-market custom gun biz and charge almost as much for something that ain't.
If you just want a shooter, get a plain-Jane Springfield mil-spec or one of the new Colt Series 70 Government Models without all the Christmas tree ornaments, and have a ball at the range. Both of these come with decent iron sights, will outlive you by several generations, and are well-made no-nonsense pistols. If later you want to customize one, most 1911 gunsmiths will be happy to work on them, something that is not true of the Norincos, Auto Ordinance, and other poorly made 1911 copies.
The Wilson-Rogers magazines are worth the money, but the $7.00 Metalform's perform just as well.
Just one man's opinion.
Bullseye
I agree with all of this. Although the Springers I've had seem prone to rust including the stainless ones. I want a gun that's rollmarked not laser etched. If you do your research and pick a Colt that's properly priced, your gun will maintain it's value. Unlike most of the competition.