While I certainly don't want to disallow anyone their personal choice, I would like to list my reasons for not having a FLGR in a 5" 1911, especially one used as a defensive weapon.
1. First, and foremost, the FLGR interferes with racking the slide one-handed against a shoe, belt, or any other resistive object that presents itself during a gunfight. We don't envisage having an arm disabled in a fight, but it does happen, and having a way to recharge the gun might keep you alive.
2. The 1911 was designed to be fully disassembled with no tools except its own parts. The design of some FLGRs requires special tools just to field strip the gun.
3. The spring in a conventional 5" 1911 is unsupported over about a half inch of its length while at rest. For all practical purposes, it is fully supported during its recoil cycle. There have been no conclusive studies done that show FLGRs improve reliability. My own KISS principle is that the least mechanical complexity naturally gives more reliability, so FLGRs, right-side safeties, extended slide releases, shok-buffs, and the like are not on any of my carry 5" 1911's.
The best 5" 1911 I own is a Wilson CQB designed for the purpose its name suggests. It has a standard guide rod, no right-side safety, no extended slide release, and no shok-buff. It functions flawlessly, and the company guarantees that it will hold 1½" at 25 yards, far better than I can shoot.
Buck
1. First, and foremost, the FLGR interferes with racking the slide one-handed against a shoe, belt, or any other resistive object that presents itself during a gunfight. We don't envisage having an arm disabled in a fight, but it does happen, and having a way to recharge the gun might keep you alive.
2. The 1911 was designed to be fully disassembled with no tools except its own parts. The design of some FLGRs requires special tools just to field strip the gun.
3. The spring in a conventional 5" 1911 is unsupported over about a half inch of its length while at rest. For all practical purposes, it is fully supported during its recoil cycle. There have been no conclusive studies done that show FLGRs improve reliability. My own KISS principle is that the least mechanical complexity naturally gives more reliability, so FLGRs, right-side safeties, extended slide releases, shok-buffs, and the like are not on any of my carry 5" 1911's.
The best 5" 1911 I own is a Wilson CQB designed for the purpose its name suggests. It has a standard guide rod, no right-side safety, no extended slide release, and no shok-buff. It functions flawlessly, and the company guarantees that it will hold 1½" at 25 yards, far better than I can shoot.
Buck