If you own a 1911, how does the craftmanship, durability and reliability compare to your 1980-present revolver?
Did you pay more to get the same or even less with either, or are both high quality and about a 1:1 cost ratio vs performance.
I have an assortment of both and they are two different animals in terms how they handle, what they feel like when fired, shooting accurately, cleaning, etc. I've had nothing but semi autos (including multi 1911's) and have recently expanded my revolver collection.
It is easier to be accurate with the revolver than the 1911. I find the 1911 requires a different hold and some practice. Don't get me wrong, I am very accurate with the 1911 but it will take some practice on your part. The 1911 is very capable. The feel is quite different with the movement of the slide to cycle the next round into the chamber.
Quality wise, it will depend on the manufacturer. The fit and finish on my Kimber is first rate. The Colt Gold Cups are nicely done but not to the level of the Kimber in my opinion, but again that's just my opinion.
Revolvers are old school and quite refreshing with the tons of black semi autos on the market these days. Like I said, I just expanded my collection, one of those being a S&W model 29 in 44 Mag. The Model 29 holds a place of distinction since it is unlike any other firearm I own.
In regard to reliability, my Gold Cup(s) will feed and shoot just about anything. I've owned one of them for over 25 years and it has only failed to cycle once.
Cleaning... I find the auto much easier to clean since you can remove the barrel. The revolver has all those cylinders that need attention.
Bottom line... everyone should own at least one 1911 styled handgun.
