OP
ThirdGen9623
Member
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2023
- Messages
- 37
- Reaction score
- 192
I understand all the annoyance EXCEPT the magazine disconnect complaint.
You altered a factory design and then sent the pistol back to the manufacturer. Most any gun manufacturer in existence would do exactly the same thing (exactly) with one small exception… some of them would charge you for the replacement of the missing parts.
Same reason that you shouldn’t send a gun back to the manufacturer with any aftermarket grips or stocks either, because you might lose them.
Similarly, if you send an old-style Ruger Blackhawk for (any!) service at Ruger, they will put all the new safety related parts in to it. (word is that they do return the original guts, in a bag)
$175 sounds like a pretty good deal for a full bead-blast refinish on a 3rd Gen.
Eh, I’m a believer in a society where stupidity isn’t an excuse for companies to take on liability. Wishful thinking.
I also am a very detail-oriented person, so it’s annoying to find something I didn’t ask for was done anyway. If I had wanted that, I’d have asked them to do it.
In my view, I sent it to them in whatever state it was in and requested only that they refinish the firearm. I didn’t request any repairs or replacement. I *wish* we lived in a world where the company only did the work that was asked of them, but I *understand* that we live in a world where they replace the factory magazine disconnect purely so that I am not able to shoot myself out of negligence and sue them for not reinstalling the part later.
It’s a minor annoyance. Let’s just hope I can get the sight drifted to remove it without damaging the brand new finish…