Mossyrock
Member
I don't have my books with me at the moment, but I am curious..... When was the 2" Combat Masterpiece introduced?
There's a kind of fuzzy zone here. The two-inch Model 56, produced for the Air Force in about 20,000 units, became known to the outside world soon after deliveries began in 1963. The gun-buying public was interested in the configuration and began lobbying S&W for a commercial version. The company responded in 1964 with the two-inch version of the Model 15, which is very similar to the Model 56 but differs in a couple of minor respects.
So the Model 56 was the first two-inch K-frame .38 with adjustable sights, but almost all of those were crushed. Specimens are rarely seen nowadays. There are some mentions of them in the forum archives for those who are interested.
If you like that type of revolver, good for you. Me, I could never figure out was it was good for.
I can conceal a 4" round but K frame much better than a 2" Combat Masterpiece with the square butt. The longer barrel pushes the butt into the body, helping to conceal it. You lose velocity and sight radius with that short barrel.
If you are carrying openly, go for the longer barrel.
The shape of the gun butt and the type of holster used determine the better carry mode.
David,
May I offer a couple of specific corrections? There were 15,025 Model 56 revolvers made and they started shipping in 1962. Sorry for nitpicking.
Regards,
Kevin Williams
I find mine to be great for EDC - see explanation below.If you like that type of revolver, good for you. Me, I could never figure out was it was good for.
I agree that the SB is a disadvantage, and seem particularly strange on a 2". However, the Rogers/Safariland grips work very well for me. They are slimmer and longer, and conceal well with the holsters I use, while providing an excellent grip, so good, in fact, that I can shoot as well with the 2" as with a 4".I can conceal a 4" round but K frame much better than a 2" Combat Masterpiece with the square butt. The longer barrel pushes the butt into the body, helping to conceal it. You lose velocity and sight radius with that short barrel.
How true!If you are carrying openly, go for the longer barrel.
The shape of the gun butt and the type of holster used determine the better carry mode.
.....I agree that the SB is a disadvantage, and seem particularly strange on a 2". However, the Rogers/Safariland grips work very well for me. They are slimmer and longer, and conceal well with the holsters I use, while providing an excellent grip, so good, in fact, that I can shoot as well with the 2" as with a 4".
!
The company responded in 1964 with the two-inch version of the Model 15, which is very similar to the Model 56 but differs in a couple of minor respects.
This would be a great place for some snubby pics.... Just say'n.
Do a search on "Model 56" with the quotes included. One of the better threads (there are quite a few) is http://smith-wessonforum.com/s-w-re...0-final-update-i-did-buy-rare-model-56-a.html . Not sure, but I think the best threads have "Model 56" in the title of the post.Can you elaborate on the minor differences? I find this kind of trivia interesting.
If you like that type of revolver, good for you. Me, I could never figure out was it was good for.
I can conceal a 4" round but K frame much better than a 2" Combat Masterpiece with the square butt. The longer barrel pushes the butt into the body, helping to conceal it. You lose velocity and sight radius with that short barrel.
If you are carrying openly, go for the longer barrel.
The shape of the gun butt and the type of holster used determine the better carry mode.