HardToHandle
Member
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2016
- Messages
- 625
- Reaction score
- 886
If you are thinking about "10 shots quickly" you better have a damn good defense in court to convince an Oprah watching jury why you shot him in the back. He will be turning faster than you can turn your finger off.
Certainly there are many variables in every situation, but the Over-shooting and back-shooting myths are just that... fables.
It is 2020, not 1950. There is well-accepted research that has been used repeatedly in various courts:
"On average, additional findings show, officers may "reasonably" fire 6 rounds or more into suspects who initially are standing and then begin falling and who, in fact, may already be mortally wounded. And that's 6 rounds per officer involved in the confrontation....
falling assailant may invite continued gunfire because a collapse or crumple can be an ambiguous movement. Falling from incapacitating wounds cannot always be distinguished from a deliberate tactical maneuver of someone who has decided to go to ground to avoid being shot or to assume a less exposed position while returning or preparing to return gunfire..."
"Excessive" Shots And Falling Assailants: A Fresh Look At OIS Subtleties | Force Science Institute