223 : 5.56 Nato

Register to hide this ad
Many recent 5.56mm barrels are now using the Wilde (Sp?) chamber which has a lead/throat that is reportedly satisfactory for both.



The designation is .223 Wylde which is a modified .223 chamber. Being that most AR barrels are 5.56 NATO they can shoot .223 without a problem. A .223 barrel should not be used with 5.56 match ammo (heavier bullets not designed for .223 chambers). If anyone cares, an explanation can be found in a recent Hornady loading manual.

I'm not exactly sure what the Wylde barrel accomplishes except maybe better accuracy when shooting service rifle matches, IDK.
 
Last edited:
I’ve shot hundreds of GI 55gr 5.56 in Ruger #3. As well as in Ruger, Rem and Savage 340s. This 5.56 / 223 issue didn’t seem to crop up until they went to the heavier load.

I think you're fine with 55-62 grain military ammo. A 75 grn. bullet in a .223 chamber is no bueno.
 
I have an 18 inch heavy barrel AR with a Wylde chamber. Accuracy with 62 grain milsurp 5.56 is superb, under 1 inch groups at 100 yards.
 
That's the general rule of thumb. Honestly, though, if you stick to 62 grain or lighter loads you'll be okay shooting 5.56mm in a .223 barrel. The potential issues crop up with longer bullets.

In the 1980's Shooting PMC 55 grain ball in a Remington 700 blew chunks of the primer into the firing pin hole, tying up the rifle, requiring gunsmith's involvement to get the rifle working.

So I'm not sure your statement is absolute.

Good Luck
 
Last edited:
In the 1980's Shooting PMC 55 grain ball in a Remington 700 blew chunks of the primer into the firing pin hole, tying up the rifle, requiring gunsmith's involvement to get the rifle working.

So I'm not sure your statement is absolute.

Good Luck
Could a 3k psi pressure difference cause that issue? Maybe. Or maybe it was a quirk of that specific rifle. The only other difference is the depth of the throat.
 
Back
Top