2400 Mag Primer ?

Luke Duke

Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2013
Messages
488
Reaction score
336
In these times of reloading components in such short supply. I find myself with 8#'s of 2400 and 4 thousand Large Magnum Pistol Primers. I realize that Alliant says Mag Primers are not necessary, but I'm going to have to use them if I want to shoot my 41 and 44 Mag.
Cant imagine having problems if I start low and work up a load.
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
Standard primers are usually recommended with #2400 but I've seen slightly better accuracy in some instances with magnum primers, but this can and will vary considerably with all the changeable factors. You're right, start low and work up.
 
When I reloaded, and I am saying this from memory, I used nothing but CCI mag primers, and nothing but 2400 powder. 21-23 grains. Like I said this is just a memory thing. Not to be used!!!!!. I am sure of the primers, but not the grains of 2400.Actually I found a full box of reloads the other day:).

I like 2400 powder, but to me it was a safety thing. You can't double charge a case without it spilling all over.
 
I keep good track of my supplies. Guess Ive been shooting up more Standard Large Pistol primers than I thought. Unfortunately I find myself with way more powder than primers! Hopefully just enough to get threw our currant administration :mad:
Or start shooting my rifles alot more , got plenty of Large and Small rifle primers
 
Last edited:
Use your mag primers without fear. Mag primers have been used with 2400 for many years with no problems until recently Speer said to use standard primers with 2400 in the .357 magnum. I have chronographed loads with mag and std primers in the .357 for comparison and I will never use std primers with 2400 again. You don't have to start low and work up with your .41 and .44 magnum loads. Just use the old published data that has been in use for many years and don't worry.
 
Like You I have thousands of LP Mag primers. Why? Because I have used Magnum primers with 2400, H110, H4227 for decades without a problem. My 44 load is 20.5 Gr 2400, 23 Gr H110, or 18 Gr H4227. All mag primed.
 
Save the mag primers for the h110, standard PP will set 2400 just fine

Yep, std PP will actually ignite 2400. They will also give you low velocities and large extreme spreads compared to mag primers. The first time that I loaded some .357s with 2400 after seeing Speer's recommendations I used Winchester std primers. The velocities were so much lower than what I was used to seeing that I thought there was something wrong with my chronograph. A little experimentation showed me what was wrong. Std primers with 2400!
 
You are wise to work up the load, starting low. Speaking for myself, whenever I load 2400, I utilize magnum primers. It is a slow burning powder and the magnum primers help it ignite and burn more consistently (my experience).

I found that when shooting .357 Magnum reloads, there is less unburned powder beneath the extractor star and a little less flash from the unburned powder at the muzzle with magnum primers. Different caliber I understand, but your results may be similar.

HTH.

JPJ
 
Mag Primers

On a side not; Ive found with my lot of Unique and my load of 10.0 grains and a 250 Keith, Magnum primers burn it much cleaner and accuracy is way better.
Also , I have 2000 Remington 6 1/2 . My understanding is that these are similar to a Mag Small pistol Primer. That their not a very hot SRP?
 
Last edited:
I also believe that (a) magnum primers raise pressures; (b) providers of reloading information wanted users to be aware of that.

Hence, they recommended magnum primers, in order that their loads not be over-pressure when some reloaders used mag primers instead of standard. Simply a matter of safety and, yes, in occasional instances, better combustion of the 2400.

I personally never used mag primers and had very good combustion, with good looking primers, easy extraction and fine accuracy.
 
Back
Top