Mine was $349 with box and papers... it was new... that was almost eight years ago. It was on closeout then - at less than half it's last MSRP. I bought it to go with the new 696 I was buying that day - $439. That was two new S&W's on the same day - for less than one of them nowadays - used - would run. Gotta admit, that 296 will be here when the 696 is gone. In a Mika's pocket holster, it'll fit over two of three of my pants front pockets. A similarly holstered 296-after-weight-watchers, my 642, will ride in any front pocket. Neither is a joy to shoot, the 296 with Georgia Arms 200gr Gold Dots & the 642 with +P Remington 158gr LHPSWC's. Both sport their OEM boots for better concealment. The rounded Uncle Mike's, like my 2" M10 came with, improve the 296's recoil, albeit at a significant CC premium.
A couple of things to look for re the used 296. Topstrap etching over the b/c gap, along with a loose cylinder, are easy to find. Not so easy - open the cylinder - see if it is still 'stopped' by the cast-in-place cylinder stop as you push the cylinder rearward. A couple of 'Hollywood raps' of the ejector rod can pare away that Al cylinder stop by the Ti cylinder's edge. Then - the cylinder can fall off backwards whenever it is released. I don't know what S&W could do about this.
The revolver is tempermental - no short cases (.44 Russians) - no lead - clad or plated bullets 200 gr or less. I tried 240gr LSWC's - mid-level loads. After four, the fifth one was fully uncrimped - would have jammed had the rounds been more energetic. I had a Al-cased Blazer 200 gr Gold Dot split it's case in my 696, so I replaced them with the new Starline brass loads from GA Arms - chrono-ed the same from the 696. Still - I like it.
Stainz