The rifle is inherently stronger than the revolver. Revolver has fixed sights, rifle sights are adjustable. For one loading to serve both pieces I recommend:
1. Stick with the handgun loading data as max for both.
2. Slower burning powders will give much better performance in the rifle than the fast burning powders. I would be looking more toward Unique, Herco, or similar than I would at Bullseye, 231, HP-38, etc.
3. Slug your barrels. Significant differences in bore and groove diameters can be expected (my .32-20 Colt Bisley Model is .316 while my Winchester 1892 is .312). Cylinder throats and forcing cone in the revolver may also present some issues. Some compromises will probably be required.
4. Fixed sights on the Hand Ejector would lead me toward developing a load that shoots to point of aim with the revolver. The Winchester's sights provide some adjustment so the same load should be workable, whereas approaching the problem the other way around (developing a rifle load, then trying to make it work in the revolver) would likely be more difficult.
5. Be sure and order the Lyman M-die for case mouth expansion for the lead bullets. Makes this part of reloading much easier, more precise, and less likely to leave you with a bunch of damaged brass from trying to seat lead bullets (.32-20 brass has pretty thin necks and walls, damage easily).
I've been working on a similar project in recent months, involving a Marlin 1894 rifle and a Colt Single Action, both in .44-40. Marlin has a groove diameter of .429, Colt's is .426". Using moderately soft cast bullets sized .427", loaded to bring POI nearest to POA in the Colt, and the same load relies on discharge pressures to "bump up" the bullets when fired in the Marlin rifle.
These projects are some of the most interesting parts of shooting older guns and reloading for them.