Lock up is tight with good timing, smooth action, pretty decent bore. A friend is making up some light loads with some starline brass he has and he casts his own .32 bullets. If test firing goes well will get some commercial .32 s&w but will stick with the shorts although this is chambered in .32 long. What makes you think its 1st change vs 3rd? I thought the first did not have a thumb cylinder release.Looks like a 32 Hand Ejector Model of 1903, 1st Change. Mfg 1904 - 1906 is S/N range of 19,426 to 51,126. I would put it in the Very Good + condition (from the pictures) and est value in the $500 - $700 range. Depending on the operational capacity, (Does it fully function?).
That would be the First Model (AKA Model of 1896). The Model of 1903 introduced the front locking lug.I thought the first did not have a thumb cylinder release.
What are the clues it was refinnished?It is a .32 HE Third Model from the 1920s. H Richard failed to count the digits in your serial number (6 digits, not five). The production period listed for this iteration in the SCSW is 1919 to 1942 (more likely production ended in 1940 or 1941, due to the effort to address wartime demands in Great Britain).
That would be the First Model (AKA Model of 1896). The Model of 1903 introduced the front locking lug.
Your example appears to have been refinished. It's probably a good shooter.
You are mixing up two different beasts. The subject revolver of this thread is a .32 caliber I frame. The .32 HE Model of 1896 did not have the thumb piece. The .32 HE acquired that feature in 1903.IIRC the Model of 1899 introduced the thumb cylinder release.
1. Silver color of hammer and trigger.What are the clues it was refinnished (sic)?