340 PD Frame Failure

Croesus

Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2007
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Location
South
Gentlemen,

I was at the range today for my quarterly pistol qualification. Following the duty gun qualification, we pulled out the little guns for our off-duty course of fire. Shooting mext to me was my buddy.

My buddy had finally brought out his S&W 340PD, a fine revolver he had purchased seven years ago, but had never fired. On a lark, he had decided to finally retire his well used 649 and go with the lighter gun. Prior to sending it in to be checked out by the armorers, he had decided to fire a qual., so when the weapon returned he would be able to carry it immediately. The armorer check is a requirement before we carry any new firearm.

Upon sucessfully completing the off-duty qualification (40 rds), we decided to linger a bit and put a few more down range just to get the feel of the new piece. About half way through the second box (approx. 75 rds), he had trouble getting the cylinder to close and handed the 340 over to me for a closer look. Upon inspection, I noted a crack extending from the bottom of the forcing cone, through the frame, to the ejector rod shroud. The crack was prominent enough that it was causing the crane to bind.

The ammo we had been using was agency issue 125gr +P GDHP .38 Special. I was suprised by the failure. I told him that it was most likely due to the barrel being over-torqued upon assembly. We called Smith this afternoon and they are sending out a shipping label to return the revolver to the factory.

I'm not posting to knock the gun or Smith, this is just the first time I have witnessed a new Smith with a frame crack. I am confident this is not a common failure, just a very distressing one, particularly in a back-up/off-duty gun.
 
Register to hide this ad
Gentlemen,

I was at the range today for my quarterly pistol qualification. Following the duty gun qualification, we pulled out the little guns for our off-duty course of fire. Shooting mext to me was my buddy.

My buddy had finally brought out his S&W 340PD, a fine revolver he had purchased seven years ago, but had never fired. On a lark, he had decided to finally retire his well used 649 and go with the lighter gun. Prior to sending it in to be checked out by the armorers, he had decided to fire a qual., so when the weapon returned he would be able to carry it immediately. The armorer check is a requirement before we carry any new firearm.

Upon sucessfully completing the off-duty qualification (40 rds), we decided to linger a bit and put a few more down range just to get the feel of the new piece. About half way through the second box (approx. 75 rds), he had trouble getting the cylinder to close and handed the 340 over to me for a closer look. Upon inspection, I noted a crack extending from the bottom of the forcing cone, through the frame, to the ejector rod shroud. The crack was prominent enough that it was causing the crane to bind.

The ammo we had been using was agency issue 125gr +P GDHP .38 Special. I was suprised by the failure. I told him that it was most likely due to the barrel being over-torqued upon assembly. We called Smith this afternoon and they are sending out a shipping label to return the revolver to the factory.

I'm not posting to knock the gun or Smith, this is just the first time I have witnessed a new Smith with a frame crack. I am confident this is not a common failure, just a very distressing one, particularly in a back-up/off-duty gun.
 
Here's an old thread about cracked frames with pics & on pg 2 you'll see a destroyed 340? & the Speed Gold Dot Ammo with it..
S&W will take care of this, Your Buddy will get a new revolver IMO..
Luckily He or You weren't injured..
I look at my AirWeight & AirLite every time I shoot them, Just in Case!!
http://smith-wessonforum.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/530103904/m/3771065352/p/1
Gary/Hk
 
This particular failure did have me worried. I am not sure what would have happened if the frame had completely failed. Probably nothing too bad, the cylinder was still there to contain the pressure but the thought of frame fragments flying in all directions is worrisome.

I'll keep everyone posted on what happens on this end. Smith was very responsive and is sending a shipping label to send the 340 back to the factory. My buddy was pretty upset about the frame cracking. I don't blame him. There were a few choice explitives that I won't repeat. All that said, new gun from the factory or not, its tough to get back confidence in a piece that failed so quickly. I must admit I had been considering a new no-lock 642/37 and am now wondering, I do have to qualify with the thing every three months. Over the years the between quals and practice, the rounds add up. Maybe an airweight is not in my future.

I was very suprised that this type of crack would develop so quickly. I am assuming the barrel was over-torqued at the factory which set up the conditions for the failure. The barrel and barrel shroud are separate components on this piece, so I'm not sure how its done.

It did get me looking more closely at my 649. My 649 had been well used over the past 14 yrs., but shows no adverse signs other than some honest wear.
 
Back
Top