sadly, 357SIG is now just a dirty lil secret amongst people of discretion... but nice snag...
I don't understand why this cartridge is playing dinosaur. It feeds perfectly with that small bottleneck. It nearly duplicates .357 Magnum ballistics. Case diameter is the same as .40 S&W. So is cartridge length. Any pistol that can handle .40 S&W can handle .357 SIG. In the 1990s, some law enforcement agencies adopted .357 SIG.
It is a little bit tricky to reload because of the very short neck and little surface on the bullet. The only time I ever developed a flinch was when I started carrying an H&K USP Compact in .357 SIG and did some serious training - it is LOUD.
My 90 grain JHP leave my SIG P229 at just over 1700 FPSWith actual .357 SIG full power loads, it starts to shine out of a full sized gun and really gets going with a Glock 35 or 24 sized auto. My G35 style gun has a 5.85" barrel. I've been procrastinating on working up a 90gr high velocity load, but 1800fps should be within reach from this platform.
One of my "to-dos" is to get a 10mm 1911 and put a 9x25 Dillon barrel in there...2000fps should be no problem with light bullets like described above.
Underwood, with the 65gr Lehigh Xtreme Defender is rated at 2,100 fps...With 90gr it is 1,700!
Cheers!
P.S. I have (in the past) reloaded their 65, 68, 90, 115 & 118gr .355" bullets in 357 SIG: there used to be much more Lehigh load data for this caliber...Never really felt the need to load them to Underwood's levels.
It's because it's not a very good subcompact or compact round, not much gained over 9mm with a lot more blast and flash. And too many loadings are really at 9mm+P power levels (probably for this reason) making it redundant.
It is a little bit tricky to reload because of the very short neck and little surface on the bullet.
If you do not already own a Lee Factory Crimp Die for the 357SIG you need to buy oneDidn't try in the 357 sig, couldn't get it to seat and crimp properly to where I felt it was going to stay put.
It's because it's not a very good subcompact or compact round, not much gained over 9mm with a lot more blast and flash. And too many loadings are really at 9mm+P power levels (probably for this reason) making it redundant.
With actual .357 SIG full power loads, it starts to shine out of a full sized gun and really gets going with a Glock 35 or 24 sized auto. My G35 style gun has a 5.85" barrel. I've been procrastinating on working up a 90gr high velocity load, but 1800fps should be within reach from this platform.
One of my "to-dos" is to get a 10mm 1911 and put a 9x25 Dillon barrel in there...2000fps should be no problem with light bullets like described above.
It is not as great a loss as people expect.I hadn't thought about losing the cartridge's advantages in a short-barreled pistol. That makes sense.
If you do not already own a Lee Factory Crimp Die for the 357SIG you need to buy one
The FCD imparts a collet crimp to the cartridge and will make many projectiles viable that you would have previously passed on because of the poor neck tension caused by the 357SIG's short neck and the ogive of many projectiles originally intended for the 9MM Parabellum and 380ACP cartridges
The projectile does not need a crimp groove to use this style of crimp
The Lee Factory Crimp Die was a game changer for me
I hadn't thought about losing the cartridge's advantages in a short-barreled pistol. That makes sense.
It is not as great a loss as people expect.
Using the 125 grain Ranger SXT as an example, the projectile leaves my SIG X-5 Allround at 1,392 FPS while when fired from the short barreled SIG P239 the projectile only drops to 1,321 FPS. That is about a 5% drop in velocity with a 30% reduction in barrel length
That 1,321 FPS is still noticeably faster than a 124 grain 9MM+P Ranger SXT loading leaves the P239 (sorry I can not find my 9MM notes at the moment. Memory says it did not break 1,200)
This is pretty much the same argument that folks make when discussing the 357 Magnum and 38 Special from short barreled firearm. A faster cartridge is always faster no matter what the barrel length you are using
Chronographs
That is what I use. Works great with a truncated bullet or a XTP. Round nose bullets ain't worth a dang in a .357 Sig. Found Gold Dots don't crimp as well. And the Lehigh don't have enough bearing surface to get a good purchase on that short neck. Seems like to get a good crimp, the bullet has to be seated out too far on the 357 sig and it won't fit the magazine then.
Rosewood
.357 SIG is a criminally underrated round with a fair amount of misinformation surrounding it, the most common being that it's really no better than 9mm +P or +P+, but the reality is that as long as it's not being downloaded, it not only leaves 9mm +P+ in the dust, but will rival anything but the hottest .357 Magnum factory loads.
Does it lose velocity out of shorter barrels? Of course, but between your typical 3.5" and .4.5" barrel the amount of velocity lost is negligible at best, maybe 50fps on average.
Granted, I've heard rumors that factory loaded .357 SIG has been loaded a bit weaker over the years, but I'm not convinced that it's accurate when the closest thing to "proof" I've seen is cheapskates on YouTube shooting a single round across the chronograph in the dead of Winter and comparing it to the results of an older video which was filmed over the Summer a year or two earlier using a completely different chronograph.
Not to go off on a tangent here, bit it annoys me to no end when folks decide to cheap out on ammo tests by only shooting a round or two at most, then calling it good enough. Make it a proper 5-shot average or don't bother. It's like, I know .357 SIG ammo is expensive, but it ain't THAT expensive.
Last but not least, I'd hate to go there, but... There are folks online who carry 9mm yet are evidently extremely insecure about it, so they feel the need to reassure themselves that it's not only perfectly adequate for self-defense, (which it certainly is) but the absolute best round available and that everything else is somehow inferior. These are the folks who seem the most apt to push the narrative that .357 SIG is no more powerful/effective than 9mm, yet somehow inexplicably manages to produce harsher recoil, concussion, and report. So these folks will happily cherry-pick any bit of information they can to push their narrative and therefore they'll jump all over the cheapskate YouTube single round ammo tests with underwhelming results.
I just picked up a whole bunch of these 124 gr. Montana Gold .355 JHP's really cheap…less than $.09 each…I'm going to try them out in .357 Sig and see how they work. I've had good results with a 124 gr. lead .355 TC bullet that I powder coat and these have a very similar profile.