As most of you know, I made TTSH sad when I bought a Springfield XDE 9mm. I think he was worried that I'd fall out of love with my 3rd Gens.
Such is not the case. The XDE was bought to be a travel gun that will be easy and relatively inexpensive to replace if "something" happens to it when I'm on a trip down south.
Right now, I have around $450.00 into the gun including a spare magazine, Clinger holsters, and some cut to fit grip tape.
Not all that expensive for a TDA 9mm single stack and accessories.
My first trip to the range was a while back to see what weight of ammunition the gun preferred. At the time, it really didn't seem to matter. 115gr, 124gr, or 147gr all seemed to go through the gun and hit the target with acceptable accuracy.
That got me to thinking. My pre rail 3913TSW doesn't like 115gr ammunition. It shoots way low compared to 124gr or 147gr. At least that's how it always behaved.
A week or so ago, I read a post here about the point of aim of the Novak sights on the 3rd Gens. It seems that the white dot is supposed to cover the intended target. Which seems kind of odd, but I guess it's so.
As it happens, I have Mepro Light night sights, but I wondered if the same thing applies. That was part of today's testing too.
I'm almost there folks, hang in.
So, today it was off to the range for a side by side comparison test.
I took a box of UMC 115gr, a box of Blazer Brass 124gr, and a box of American Eagle 147gr. All rounds are FMJ.
I put 25 rounds of each box into B29 targets at about 25 feet.
Keep in mind that I don't get to the range nearly as often as I should. My groups are not timed, fired from a rest, or anything but two hand using a triangular stance.
Note that the tendency to pull to the right side of the target is all me. If I take my time and really think through the process, that goes away. Well, for the most part.
First up was the XDE with the 115gr ammunition. To my surprise the ammunition did not perform as well as my previous test. Not horrible, but more spread than I'd previously seen.
Not bad, but the pull is obvious. I'd call this acceptable for self defense shooting at close range.
The 3913TSW was up next. To my surprise aiming with the top of the site a bit higher up corrected the low hit situation I'd seen before. There was a bit more spread of the shots, but more of them hit the center ring. Not that I expect to go back to 115 gr for this gun, but I don't have to be scared of it either.
Next up the XDE with 124gr ammunition.
A couple of down and out fliers in the first magazine, for reasons unknown. Again, once I bore down a bit and spent time on the fundamentals accuracy improved.
Still a bit of pull to the right, but not bad.
Interestingly, at least to me, the 3913TSW didn't do quite as well as the XDE. At least in terms of consistency. A few more X ring hits than with the XDE, but more spread of hits. Again, acceptable, but I can do better with more practice and attention on fundamentals. (That seems to be a theme)
On to the XDE with 147gr ammunition.
Some spread, but more hits on center than with the other ammunition. Overall, pretty good, or at least pretty average.
Last up, the 3913TSW with 147 gr ammunition.
I think this is the best grouping of all of the tests. I take no credit for this, I just think that the gun was designed around this weight of bullet.
Reasonably good accuracy overall. I carry 147gr JHP for self defense, which I think is the best round to use.
Final thoughts. The XDE is a very nice handgun, but it's not a 3rd Gen. One of my excuses for some of the shot placement is that it's considerably lighter than the 3913TSW. Not that that gun is heavy, but the alloy frame does add some weight and at least for me that improves balance.
The controls on both guns are similar. The XDE has a thinner profile, which some people don't like. I like it because it aids with concealability. I've had some thinning done on the TSW, and it's much better than as it came out of the factory.
I'm sure that when I get the XDE to the range more often, I'll get used to the balance. Recoil is very manageable, so the lighter weight doesn't hurt in that regard.
I prefer the TSW, but won't be embarrassed to carry the XDE when I'm on the road.
Such is not the case. The XDE was bought to be a travel gun that will be easy and relatively inexpensive to replace if "something" happens to it when I'm on a trip down south.
Right now, I have around $450.00 into the gun including a spare magazine, Clinger holsters, and some cut to fit grip tape.
Not all that expensive for a TDA 9mm single stack and accessories.
My first trip to the range was a while back to see what weight of ammunition the gun preferred. At the time, it really didn't seem to matter. 115gr, 124gr, or 147gr all seemed to go through the gun and hit the target with acceptable accuracy.
That got me to thinking. My pre rail 3913TSW doesn't like 115gr ammunition. It shoots way low compared to 124gr or 147gr. At least that's how it always behaved.
A week or so ago, I read a post here about the point of aim of the Novak sights on the 3rd Gens. It seems that the white dot is supposed to cover the intended target. Which seems kind of odd, but I guess it's so.
As it happens, I have Mepro Light night sights, but I wondered if the same thing applies. That was part of today's testing too.
I'm almost there folks, hang in.
So, today it was off to the range for a side by side comparison test.
I took a box of UMC 115gr, a box of Blazer Brass 124gr, and a box of American Eagle 147gr. All rounds are FMJ.
I put 25 rounds of each box into B29 targets at about 25 feet.
Keep in mind that I don't get to the range nearly as often as I should. My groups are not timed, fired from a rest, or anything but two hand using a triangular stance.
Note that the tendency to pull to the right side of the target is all me. If I take my time and really think through the process, that goes away. Well, for the most part.
First up was the XDE with the 115gr ammunition. To my surprise the ammunition did not perform as well as my previous test. Not horrible, but more spread than I'd previously seen.
Not bad, but the pull is obvious. I'd call this acceptable for self defense shooting at close range.

The 3913TSW was up next. To my surprise aiming with the top of the site a bit higher up corrected the low hit situation I'd seen before. There was a bit more spread of the shots, but more of them hit the center ring. Not that I expect to go back to 115 gr for this gun, but I don't have to be scared of it either.


Next up the XDE with 124gr ammunition.
A couple of down and out fliers in the first magazine, for reasons unknown. Again, once I bore down a bit and spent time on the fundamentals accuracy improved.
Still a bit of pull to the right, but not bad.

Interestingly, at least to me, the 3913TSW didn't do quite as well as the XDE. At least in terms of consistency. A few more X ring hits than with the XDE, but more spread of hits. Again, acceptable, but I can do better with more practice and attention on fundamentals. (That seems to be a theme)

On to the XDE with 147gr ammunition.
Some spread, but more hits on center than with the other ammunition. Overall, pretty good, or at least pretty average.

Last up, the 3913TSW with 147 gr ammunition.
I think this is the best grouping of all of the tests. I take no credit for this, I just think that the gun was designed around this weight of bullet.
Reasonably good accuracy overall. I carry 147gr JHP for self defense, which I think is the best round to use.

Final thoughts. The XDE is a very nice handgun, but it's not a 3rd Gen. One of my excuses for some of the shot placement is that it's considerably lighter than the 3913TSW. Not that that gun is heavy, but the alloy frame does add some weight and at least for me that improves balance.
The controls on both guns are similar. The XDE has a thinner profile, which some people don't like. I like it because it aids with concealability. I've had some thinning done on the TSW, and it's much better than as it came out of the factory.
I'm sure that when I get the XDE to the range more often, I'll get used to the balance. Recoil is very manageable, so the lighter weight doesn't hurt in that regard.
I prefer the TSW, but won't be embarrassed to carry the XDE when I'm on the road.