Obviously, steel frames aren't going to normally experience the same sort of wear that can be experienced with an aluminum alloy frame.
The attached couple of pics are of my own 4013TSW, and show the wear & tear experienced inside the frame's barrel camming area and on top of the frame rails. (I've seen much the same thing on other 3rd gen alloy-framed guns, of all 3 calibers.)
Someone visiting from S&W once viewed my gun and told me his pair of 4003TSW's exhibited similar wear ... and his had been used as weekend copm guns to fire more than 25K rounds each. (Mine had only been fired approx 2,500+ rounds at that time.)
He said those types of wear are normal, become more or less self-limiting, and as long as the gun easily & smoothly unlocks & locks (when checked using an EMPTY gun, manually running the slide), typically aren't considered to be a 'problem'.
Now, I'd expect the larger rail surfaces and tighter tolerances of the TSW models to offer some potential for longer service lives than the older 4003's (ongoing improvements occurred in the TSW line).
Even so, a couple of the best ways to help promote optimal service life on a 3rd gen alloy frame is to make sure it remains to make sure the frame rails are properly lubricated, and to replace the recoil springs periodically to help mitigate battering.
I like to keep mentioning a comment made by an armorer instructor for another gun company, I heard earlier this year at an armorer recert, which was ...
Fresh springs help keep guns alive.
The normal recommendation for armorer is to replace recoil (and mag) springs every 5K rounds fired or every 5 years (talking about in-service duty weapons). I like to replace mine much sooner.
Recoil springs are cheap insurance.
If it were
my new old-model 4003, I'd stick to using factory ammo made by one of the major American ammo makers ... and I'd
not feed it a steady diet of the harder recoiling 155gr (and lighter) loads. They can be harder on guns.
That's just me, though.