Why would an under powered load cause the barrel to crack/ring especially since you did not fire a round into the back of the first round?
I disagree. If this is a ammo issue why didnt s&w make the owner pay for the parts and treat it like the customers that have the kabooms?
Gary,
But S&W did not pay initial shipping in Emory's case.
Ruger also pays initial shipping for all 'warranty type' repairs.
But emory's case wasn't a warranty job.
While I'm here I'll say that for a non warranty job they moved pretty fast! Also, yeah, a squib alone should not ring the barrel, but if it did, what the hey?
And also I agree that it was an ammo issue and S&W were gracious to do the work free.
Because they are, in my experience, willing to do all sorts of things they do not have to do, if you ask nicely. I have always offered to pay. I never expect them to do free work. Most of the time the gun is back with all the work completed even before the mailed "estimate" is received. In my experience, S&W has always been thorough, considerate, and they have been great to deal with.
...Sadly, I have 600rds of the same exact ammo and I am hesitant to shoot any. I know that, stastically speaking, I have nothing to fear. It seems stupid to go buy more target ammo when I have so much already. Maybe I will go shoot up all my good hollow points.![]()
Hey Gang,
I worked for S&W for a number of years as a regional LE sales manager. I have never seen a company as dedicated to customer service as S&W. They truely make every effort to keep their customers happy and I have seen many instances where they go way beyond the call of duty to do so. I have also taught armorer's courses fo a couple of the other major manufacturers and have not seen the same level of dedication to their customer base, that I saw at S&W. The folks that work at Smith truely love working there and when I was there there were several families with 3 generations working at the same time. There was one individual that had been with them for 40 years and could have retired anytime. He always said " I love what I do". They are one of the great gun companies.
Ref the squib load. Not sure why your barrel ringed but I will tell you that Smith makes one of the toughest barrels out there. They are through heat treated and I have seen several occasions where .40's have been fired with a plugged barrel (bullet stuck) and the barrel was still servicable. Try that with a Glock and see what happens! The Kalifornia Highway Patrol even had a requirement that their service pistols be capable of doing that and Smith was the only manufacturer able to repeatably meet that spec. I have also taught at LE academys for over 35 years and have seen dozens of squibs from every manufacturer and the comment about it not being "lot" related is probably most correct. Ammo makers load millions of rounds very month. To expect all of them to be perfect is a stretch. That's why guns are "proofed".
I am happy to hear such good things about S&W but here is where I am right now, I have a 642-2 that came from the performance center. It was supposed to have a trigger job done to it as part of what they do but it didn't seem any different than a 642 that had not been through the performance center so I called them they sent me a shipping label and I sent the gun to them. They received the gun June 5th. About a month later I got an estimate to refinish the frame and nothing about the trigger so I called them and they couldn't understand how that happened. They said they would talk to the gunsmith and take care of that and the gun would be back to me in mid August. Huh? You guys are getting quick service and mine is taking maybe 2 1/2 months? I think I'll call them again.
Any suggestions?
Why would an under powered load cause the barrel to crack/ring especially since you did not fire a round into the back of the first round?