Harley Fan
Member
I'm a new shooter, and a new reloader. First reloading with a Lee loader for .38 sp then moving to a single stage press, then to a turret press. Over the last year I've developed several loads in both .38 special and .357 mag. Always considering the limitations of powder availability, it's been fun to develop loads I'm pleased with.
Recently, my son bought a Glock in .45acp, and we added dies for that. We've gone through 500 or so rounds, judging by the primer and bullet supply.
Well, a Smith revolver guy myself, I find myself the proud owner of a never fired Colt M1991 Ser 80 .45. Thus far, I've had it to the range twice, getting familiar with it. (Quite a departure from my 686-2) I've put 150 rounds of factory 230 gr. ball through it, and I've worked up several different starting loads using the powder I have available. (Sorry this is taking so long)
When reloading, I've always followed to the letter COL heights, exercised caution on quality control, etc. So when I started loading for the son's Glock, the powder I have (IMR-PB, Tite Group, 700-X) my Lyman 49 lists COL at 1.200"
Aaron's Glock eats everything you feed it.
Well, Sunday, I encountered a feed failure in my Colt. I ejected it on the floor, kicked it down the range and went on. It was a start load with IMR-PB, and I noted the other 5 rounds had significantly less recoil.
This was the only failure. But as I thought this over after the range visit, I'm stunned at the disparity on COL for 230 gr. ball in .45. The book says 1.275" max... and for the powders I have, using 230 gr. LRN, it lists 1.200" COL, a whopping .075" shorter!
I'm out of factory rounds, so I pressed two dummy rounds together, one at max, the other at 1.200".
I got a magazine out and put the ball end where it might be in the pistol. sorry for the crappy photography.
The first is a cartridge imitating a factory round, measuring 1.270". The second one is the 1.200" one, forward to the nose, where it might ride. The cartridge body is 1/3 out of the feed lips!
My questions:
1) Can these short cartridges cause a problem with feeding in a 1911? Or might have my lone failure been a wimpy loading? (Note that I was most satisfied with a 700-X load of 4.8 gr- right in the middle.)
2) I always reach for Lyman 49. It's where I got the 1.200" COL. But I have a Lee Modern Reloading, whose chart says "MIN OAL 1.200".
I measured the depth of a cartridge, then figured the cylinder where the powder goes. From 1.275" to 1.200" is a whopping 18% difference! What would happen if I loaded my favorite loading of 4.8 gr. of 700-X to a COL closer to 1.275" so these cartridges fit better in the Colt mag?
Thanks to all of you who got this far on this post!
Recently, my son bought a Glock in .45acp, and we added dies for that. We've gone through 500 or so rounds, judging by the primer and bullet supply.
Well, a Smith revolver guy myself, I find myself the proud owner of a never fired Colt M1991 Ser 80 .45. Thus far, I've had it to the range twice, getting familiar with it. (Quite a departure from my 686-2) I've put 150 rounds of factory 230 gr. ball through it, and I've worked up several different starting loads using the powder I have available. (Sorry this is taking so long)

When reloading, I've always followed to the letter COL heights, exercised caution on quality control, etc. So when I started loading for the son's Glock, the powder I have (IMR-PB, Tite Group, 700-X) my Lyman 49 lists COL at 1.200"
Aaron's Glock eats everything you feed it.
Well, Sunday, I encountered a feed failure in my Colt. I ejected it on the floor, kicked it down the range and went on. It was a start load with IMR-PB, and I noted the other 5 rounds had significantly less recoil.
This was the only failure. But as I thought this over after the range visit, I'm stunned at the disparity on COL for 230 gr. ball in .45. The book says 1.275" max... and for the powders I have, using 230 gr. LRN, it lists 1.200" COL, a whopping .075" shorter!
I'm out of factory rounds, so I pressed two dummy rounds together, one at max, the other at 1.200".

I got a magazine out and put the ball end where it might be in the pistol. sorry for the crappy photography.
The first is a cartridge imitating a factory round, measuring 1.270". The second one is the 1.200" one, forward to the nose, where it might ride. The cartridge body is 1/3 out of the feed lips!


My questions:
1) Can these short cartridges cause a problem with feeding in a 1911? Or might have my lone failure been a wimpy loading? (Note that I was most satisfied with a 700-X load of 4.8 gr- right in the middle.)
2) I always reach for Lyman 49. It's where I got the 1.200" COL. But I have a Lee Modern Reloading, whose chart says "MIN OAL 1.200".
I measured the depth of a cartridge, then figured the cylinder where the powder goes. From 1.275" to 1.200" is a whopping 18% difference! What would happen if I loaded my favorite loading of 4.8 gr. of 700-X to a COL closer to 1.275" so these cartridges fit better in the Colt mag?
Thanks to all of you who got this far on this post!

Last edited: