I know it's a very handsome revolver!!Anyone know anything about this run? 29-4 5” un-fluted cylinder full under lug barrel.View attachment 894730View attachment 894731
Like a lot of us I prefer P&R but appparently Smith only started doing full lug barrels after they stopped pinning them. Maybe there’s an engineering/tech reason for it but who knows. Based on my experience with my now-departed 5” 686+ Talo, which is very similar except for size and chambering, I can see how it would balance so well in hand. I would definitely prefer CH4’s lovely combat grips on that blue for contrast as well although the goodyears are no doubt easier on the hands under full power loads.Anyone know anything about this run? 29-4 5” un-fluted cylinder full under lug barrel.View attachment 894730View attachment 894731
I call them condom grips.Like a lot of us I prefer P&R but appparently Smith only started doing full lug barrels after they stopped pinning them. Maybe there’s an engineering/tech reason for it but who knows. Based on my experience with my now-departed 5” 686+ Talo, which is very similar except for size and chambering, I can see how it would balance so well in hand. I would definitely prefer CH4’s lovely combat grips on that blue for contrast as well although the goodyears are no doubt easier on the hands under full power loads.
Who the heck came up with that nickname for those grips anyways?
Tom
The smooth cylinder guns were a special edition run called the “Classic Hunter” edition. Not to be confused with the new “Classic” series of throw back pistols. Similar to/pre-dates the modern custom shop “Performance Center” run.Anyone know anything about this run? 29-4 5” un-fluted cylinder full under lug barrel.View attachment 894730View attachment 894731