5” 29-4

That sure looks good in blue; I have the 5” stainless version and 8 3/8” 29-5.
Mine doesn’t have the unfluted cylinder and Iam happy about that. I am probably in the minority here, but to my eye the unfluted cylinder looks unfinished.
IMG_9284.webp
IMG_4754.webp
 
Anyone know anything about this run? 29-4 5” un-fluted cylinder full under lug barrel.View attachment 894730View attachment 894731
Like a lot of us I prefer P&R but appparently Smith only started doing full lug barrels after they stopped pinning them. Maybe there’s an engineering/tech reason for it but who knows. Based on my experience with my now-departed 5” 686+ Talo, which is very similar except for size and chambering, I can see how it would balance so well in hand. I would definitely prefer CH4’s lovely combat grips on that blue for contrast as well although the goodyears are no doubt easier on the hands under full power loads.

Who the heck came up with that nickname for those grips anyways?

Tom
 
Like a lot of us I prefer P&R but appparently Smith only started doing full lug barrels after they stopped pinning them. Maybe there’s an engineering/tech reason for it but who knows. Based on my experience with my now-departed 5” 686+ Talo, which is very similar except for size and chambering, I can see how it would balance so well in hand. I would definitely prefer CH4’s lovely combat grips on that blue for contrast as well although the goodyears are no doubt easier on the hands under full power loads.

Who the heck came up with that nickname for those grips anyways?

Tom
I call them condom grips.
 
I would really like to have one that is closer to new condition and with the box, but considering there’s only 500 of produced and it’s one of my favorite configurations. I feel blessed to have found it, especially for what I paid for it compared to today’s prices.
Tom

IMG_7177.webpIMG_7175.webpIMG_7176.webp
 
Back
Top