624 recall

I almost missed this thread. I sent my 624 in for inspection and it came back within 2 weeks as I recall. No communication from S&W, only a sheet of paper that indicated "no repairs needed". When I first made contact with S&W they said that they would send me a shipping label, then they recanted and said there was a problem with the serial number. So I called S&W to find out what was wrong and they indicated it was not under a lifetime warranty, since it was built in 1985, therefore I would have to pay shipping. Guess I didn't talk to the right person. Regardless, I am now a proud owner of a fine Model 624 that I'm not afraid to shoot. And it is awesome.
 
Just recieved an email from Kate. She appologized for the delay and said that my gun should ship out tomorrow or Friday. Apparently that means it passed inspection.
 
WOOHOO! My 624 is home! Recieved with the note: No repair necessary. Funny thing is today I also got a letter from S&W telling me that they recieved my gun and should have the work done in 2-3 weeks. Hopefully I can get some time to shoot it this week.
 
624

Well, Wish me luck. Mine went out on FED ex yesterday. S&W was really helpful so far. Kate sent me a label for FED EX and I can't wait to get it back.
 
It appears to my untrained eye that very few 624's are subject to the problems of the recall.

This is a good thing!

As far as I can figure, I would not have had the opportunity to purchase one if the specter of the recall hadn't made the previous owner uneasy.

I don't think I'm alone in this.

Congrats on the clean bill of health on your 624.

:)
 
Thanks Snapping Twig.
The sad thing is S&W has made this worse for both themselves and us by:
1. not marking the guns
2. by not maintaining a list of which guns get checked
or
3. both

Judging by the small number that actually get kept, (I believe the number is 1, in recent years) I suspect that most of the problem guns were found in within the first year or so. We are just retesting those same guns over and over again. Even though S&W didn't do it in the beginning, don't you think it would be a good idea for them to start doing either 1, 2 or 3 at this point? Perhaps we could start maintaining a list of our own. Those of us who have guns that have been checked submit the serial numbers and someone here maintains a list with and notes. Such as;
S/N AHBXXXX shipped after the problem date.
S/N AHBXXXY Checked in 1987 OK per S&W.

Obviously not perfect, but at least we could limit some of the shipping and the stress this causes owners. It would also be honor system as there is no way to verify that an owner who submited their gun to the list was being truthful, although I see no reason that someone might lie about it.
 
Well, Wish me luck. Mine went out on FED ex yesterday. S&W was really helpful so far. Kate sent me a label for FED EX and I can't wait to get it back.
Good luck, I'm sure it will be fine. I'm glad I sent mine because now I can shoot it with any load I choose and have peace of mind.
 
Yeah!

Got mine back today! It was gone from my hands only 8 days (counting labor day weekend) Amazing turnaround, but most importantly....I got it back with a nice note: No repairs required. And there is a little tell tale hardness tester dimple on the face of the cylinder where they checked it. Great job Smith and Wesson.
 
6 or 7 years ago I sent one back that was defective after testing. Smith gave me credit toward a new 500 mag which I still have. All I have now have been tested with the dimple and are fine.

dogdoc
 
My 624 3" falls in the recall SN range, ALUxxxx. They are sending me a shipping label. I had my revolver for sale on the forum classifieds and pulled the ad after deciding that I wouldn't buy one if the recall wasn't taken care of. If it passes the test, I will relist it with a clear conscience. Wish me luck.......

Dave
 
I found this thread as I was following up in my new to me 624. Before I acquired from the original owner I called SW and asked if it fell within the range, my serial is AHB4761. They told me it was good and I went on my way. But before I took it to the range I thought I woukd inquire by email so that I had a record of thier sign off. Well instead of getting an all clear they asked me to return the gun for inspection. So, I completed the information for the shipping label they are to send me. I wanted to check to see if my serial number is after those that were sent back in or before. I am not sure of the cut off date or number and wanted to get a sense of what the odds are that my gun makes it back to me. When I do ship it out it will be wearing a pair of Hogue grips instead of the original ones in the event the gun does not make it home. Any help on knowing where my serial number falls compared to those of you that sent your gun in sure would be appreciated. I pm now this is an old thread but thought I woukd take a chance and see what I can come up with.
 
Try this thread. The title is misleading but there's good info contained here: http://smith-wessonforum.com/s-w-revolvers-1980-present/228795-624-chambers-44-mag.html

Take a look at post #12 - from that info it looks like your s/n is in the recall range.

Thanks. I got the label today. I emailed the person that sent me the label with the specific question of what happens to my gun if it is defective and can't be repaired. His response was that the test would be a test fire and that cylinders were on hand. Call me a skeptic but it sure sounds like he did not know what he was talking about since what I have read indicates they ran out of cylinders along time ago and that a test left a dimple on the cylinder. What good would a test fire prove. I hesitate to return the gun but what good does it do me to just hold on to it. I guess I will send it back.
 
Well I bit the bullet and sent my gun off to Smith and Wesson. A very painless process with them providing the label and using one of Federal Express' express boxes. The gun should be there by tomorrow and hopefully I will know something in the next week or two.......I am hoping that the gun passes the inspection and is winging its way back to me soon. But I am not feeling to confident based on conflicting information I get from SW, but then that is probably par for the course.
 
Back
Top