Yeah, it isn't like anyone carries it around or shoots it that way. The action is only opened like that for a couple of seconds BETWEEN shots. Totally irrelevant - so much so that the attempted joke falls flat.I kind of understand the comments about not liking the magazine, because who wants a lever action where part of the gun sticks way out underneath?
![]()
Hey, wait a minute....![]()
i did it better... converted an 1894C to 9mm, 16.5" barrel threaded
the barrel is a 9mm barrel too not the orig 357
I kinda like it. Not enough to spend two grand on it, but if somebody gave me one I'd have a blast with it.
I would prefer 9mm manual action to be a pump.
I always wanted a 22 pump and would love the 38/357 and even 9mm in pump action.
It would be a hoot to shoot either lever or pump in 9mm.
If it were possible and practical to build tube fed lever guns that use rimless pistol cartridges somebody would have done it long before now.![]()
A tube fed lever gun depends on a fair sized cartridge rim for proper feeding.
If you recall, lever guns in .45 Colt didn't appear until a few years ago. Back in the 1800s the original .45 Colt cartridge had a smaller rim which wasn't wide enough to reliably feed in lever actions. I forget exactly when it happened, but the .45 Colt was modified with a slightly wider rim that will now work in lever actions.
My guess is that this new 9mm abomination uses detachable magazines simply because that's the only way it can reliably feed.