He describes one encounter in which an armed robber absorbed two full loads of 12 gauge, 00 buckshot, remained on his feet and bolted for the door.
. . .
Remember the Secret service agent who went down with a single .22 Rimfire to the gut during the attempt on President Reagan's life?
. . .
I admire the younger guys with massive arms and shoulders that can lock up a .40 or greater cartridge and pour rounds into the 10-ring like they're shooting BBs.
Your anecdotes are interesting but irrelevant. We all have stories like this, including me. There are lots of stories of people charged up on drugs like PCP that took many shots (15-20 or more) and still kept coming. If you are going to evaluate anything that involves human activity the only thing that is really meaningful, reliable, and actionable are statistics of a representative population.
Have you shot a .40 round? I am far, far from both young and strong, certainly NOT having "massive" arms, and I don't find the Shield 40 to offer any increased physical challenge. Like any gun, one must train on the gun he/she plans to use.
Although this may not be a perfect test, here is one test on video that shows little difference in recoil between a .40 and 9mm:
[ame=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ETax3N5mDY&list=PLJRy9yFn5iq90exc0FAwYJOOF7PIIgnc-&index=18]M&P Shield 40 & Ruger LC9 Recoil Comparison[/ame]
But this is just one test, and probably not statistically significant. What I'd really like to see is a series of scientific tests where all factors remain constant except for the caliber, and the recoil is properly measured with accurate scientific devices. Perhaps the difference in recoil (between .40 & 9mm) varies with pistol. I don't know.
I'm all for reviewing and comparing facts. If you, or anyone, have other recoil tests you'd like to cite, please do so. Since you don't know me, and I don't know you, opinions don't really matter. As Sgt. Friday is often quoted as saying: "
Just the facts, ma'am, just the facts"
