Accuracy load data?

I have used IMR-4895 in all three calibers mentioned with outstanding success.....might work for you as well.

Randy
 
I had a multi-year effort to find the "best load" for a 45-90 Sharps and learned not to rely on other peoples or company's data. It is a combination of style of gun (semi - bolt - pump - single shot), barrel length, powder brand, powder weghts, bullet design, bullet hardness, bullet diameter, sorting out best velocities for the gun's rifling turn rate, shooting distance, etc., etc., etc.

Way to many variables to just grab someone else's data. I can be sure that no listing contains even half the background information needed as listed above. It can be a long journey to accuracy for almost every gun a person owns and often ends in the shooter deciding a particular load is just OK.

I went through at least 6 different powders and countless powder weights, many different bullet designs and weights, several lead bullet hardness readings, and finally can reliably shoot out to 400 yards, consistently hitting a 12" steel plate with simple peep sight. I am certain that my best load is found nowhere in published data sets. Now on to 600!!:D
 
Last edited:
Those "Old School" types among us..

Thanks for all the insight. I'm looking for a good starting point, and I want to be looking in the right direction.

I'm a commercial photographer, trained old school. film, development process, chemicals, cameras, lenses, lighting, a LOT of variables and individual "quirks". I just want a fighting chance from the outset.

...may confirm that, unless you are constantly and consistantly shooting from a stable rest there will be more relevant variables than the "most accurate" powder choice: I would opine that the guy, or the gun and/or the bullet itself can make a bigger difference as far as the concept of "accuracy" is concerned... And NOT NECESSARILLY in that order, either.

Truly, the only way to find out for sure is to experiment: this may prove to be a lot harder in the future than in the recent past.:eek:

Your old school training and experience in photography (as opposed to image manipulation?) should serve you well!

Cheers and Good Luck!
 
Back
Top