That article is just one person's opinion. He seems to favor velocity over anything else. The factor he is neglecting is penetration. 22lr is a weak round no matter what you use, let's not kid ourselves. To me a 40gr at the highest possible velocity for that weight will give the most penetration. This is why I am going with the Velocitor. I would actually prefer a 40gr solid, and will test Mini-Mag RN as well.
A light, high speed hollow point will dump it's energy perhaps only a few inches inside the target. Good for squirrels, not good for human-sized threats. We aren't planning to stop dangerous squirrels with our 43Cs if we use them in personal defense roles.
All that said, to me the 43C is best used as a training tool for carrying a 642/442 with 38 +Ps. Bet your life on at least a .38, not 22lr.![]()
Very True! That is exactly why I orderd it. I want to be able to teach my wife and son to shoot with the .22 J-Frame and then eventually move up to the 642. Seems like a logical step/order.
The only issue might be the long, heavy DAO trigger pull on the Centennial models. Do you have a 22lr target revolver or semi-auto to start them on? The 43C will be great training for carry, but difficult to learn the fundamentals of shooting with.
A 43C is an easy step to a 442/642. However, it is not an easy step to shooting handguns in general. Most pistols have much lighter and easier triggers, longer sight radiuses, and larger more comfortable grips.
Aguila Interceptor is a 40 grain flat nose with about 190 ft lb
of energy. Just about the same energy as 380 auto or 38
special federal hydra shock. They're a lot cheaper than CCI too.