Sorry, but I decide when I stop - you don't get to silence people because they disagree. This board isn't part of the cancel culture.
Nobody is trying to silence you. The suggestion for you to stop was made because you are destroying any credibility you may have, or think you may have, on this board. Nobody said this board was cancel culture, though the staff here have removed posts condemning a previous poster's comments about online ammo sales.
Let me clarify since a lot of what I said apparently went over your head.
My question about the philosophy of "training with what you carry" is in regards to a topic with a long history on this forum. It wasn't a direct reference to anything the other poster said. It was a reference to a universally accepted principle of self defensive carry. Again, if you read what I said I specifically referred to it as a PRINCIPLE. If you don't know what that word means in this context, I suggest you look it up. Obviously it is a principle that you appear to be unfamiliar with.
I am going to quote you verbatim
How's that fit with the "train with what you carry" philosophy? Do you not believe in that principle, or are you going to carry a BB gun for self defense?
Obviously most normal people arent going to train with what they carry. Hell, federal LEAs arent practicing solely with JHPs anymore.
But direct to the point, the comment you responded to was strictly about "Practice is just trigger pull and sight alignment and a BB gun will do that just as good as a center fire gun and a lot cheaper."
While I do not agree with the poster that BB or airsoft guns are "just as good as a centerfire", I do believe they have merit.
The rhetorical question that followed my statement about "training with the gun you are going to use for self defense" is a reference to the fact that training with a BB gun only fits with that principle IF you plan to use a BB gun for self defense. Obviously no one does - that is what made the question rhetorical. It amazes me that something so simple has to be so exhaustively explained for you to "get" it, but there it is.
You can continue on, blithering about about about how doing basic trigger manipulation, sight alignment , and even overall manipulation of a weapon can be done with a BB gun or airsoft. Using a BB gun or airsoft isnt exclusive to someone carrying said weapons for defensive purposes. To think otherwise is the spiel of someone so misinformed, uninformed, and deluded on the subject of training. It saddens me that this has to rehashed to an unhealthy level for you.
The whole theme of what I have been TRYING to get you to understand is that the 8 million new gun owners in this country need to put a significant number of rounds downrange in order to become proficient with their new gun. Especially since the vast majority of them bought their first gun SPECIFICALLY for self defense, because they are concerned about what has been going on across the country. NOT getting that practice means they aren't really prepared and maybe even unsafe. Practicing with a BB gun will improve some fundamentals of marksmanship, but it hardly prepares a person for self defense with a real gun. For that purpose THERE IS NO SUBSTITUTE FOR LIVE FIRE.
Nobody is saying there is a SUBSTITUTE FOR LIVE FIRE. What we're saying is you can get certain things done with a BB or airsoft replica of the pistol you choose to carry. Good work can be done with these devices. Are they perfect? Nope. But nobody ever said they are or were. To quote a flash-in-the-pan Youtube personality, "...but it helps". Thats it. They help.
These statements are generally universally accepted by anyone who knows which end of the gun a bullet comes out of. Not sure why you have such an issue with what I have been trying to say.
The only one lacking any comprehension on the subject is you. You are blithering on as if you're an expert on training and tactics, and as if you are somehow the moral beacon in the sea of ammunition inequity. You arent any of those, and I feel like that's been readily established here.
The thing that started the whole discussion is my statement that with the current price of ammo, many new gun owners cannot afford the ammo for the amount of practice and training they need to become proficient. I believe the "scalpers" or "profiteers" or whatever you want to call them are largely responsible for that fact. If that hits too close to home for you, oh well...
Supply and demand. Low supply and high demand drive the prices, not scalpers or profiteers. There are far more facets to this issue than people who hit up the local big box store every morning for a few boxes of ammo to possibly flip. There is a pandemic that hampered supply chains (which still havent caught up). One of the major ammunition suppliers ceasing ops altogether for financial reasons, getting sold at auction, and only recently restarting ops under a new corporate entity. Then you can bring in the estimated 8M new shooters, and use the conservative 100/per new shooter, thats 80M rounds of ammo that went to new shooters. You, me, we are dealing with a literal perfect storm in this ammo crunch.
BTW I know all about "realistic" airsofts. I have one with the recoiling action you talk about. I'm attaching a couple of photos of it below. It is a full-size replica of a Sig P226 that uses green gas. It weighs about 1/2 to 2/3 as much as the real thing, and the slide reciprocates "just like the real thing" - except that it is nothing like shooting the real thing. The slide is the part that makes it so much lighter than a real gun - it has to be lighter for the gas pressure to make it reciprocate. This one - even being full size - has less recoil than even a 22LR or 25ACP. Plus the trigger has WAY less resistance than a real DA trigger.
So I'm sorry, but I am not convinced that practicing with one of these is sufficient preparation for self defense. Is the trigger and sight alignment practice better than no practice at all? Sure. Is it "realistic" practice/preparation - not even close.
Again.... Nobody is saying it has to be on par with a centerfire counterpart. The issue is lack of ammo means no training of anykind, whereas a BB gun or airsoft provides
some form of training. It doesnt matter how light the BB gun or airsoft gun is. It doesnt matter how light the recoil is. It doesnt even matter what the trigger is like. Doing SOMETHING is better than NOTHING. Sitting at home digging splinters out of your dumper while pining for ammunition isnt going to help you in a self defense situation.
Also, one last tidbit from instructor Claude Werner. On his page he frequently posts articles regarding self defense shootings. He finds that most involved in SD shootings have never attended a training course, much less fired their weapon 1,000 rounds. And yet these Joe/Jane Schmoe types still manage to come out on top more often than not. I am no way advocating that anyone not attend a course, or get quality trigger time and fam fire, they absolutely are a positive and help to further increase the odds in the good guy's favor.