Another drone shooting. This is not going to go away.

"Funny, the comments at Ars Techica are mostly in favor of the guy who shot it, the comments here are about 50/50."

A lot of real techies tend to be libertarians at least philosophically.
Anti gummint spying, pro encryption, pro privacy etc.
Ars' viewpoint doesn't surprise me.
Freedom is just that.
It's eroding as politicians and lawyers fail to grasp that piling up laws by definition limits our options.
Also a result of socialists not wanting to take personal responsibility for anything.
 
Last edited:
Well, about the only other thing I can think of to say about this whole drone issue and the apparently eminent Drone War Apocalypse is...keep watching the skies!

But hey, if you think drones are bad, you ain't seen nuthin' yet. Wait'll those remote controlled squirrels and birds start showing up...roosting in your trees and scampering all over your roofs at all hours of the day and night. Your privacy will be a thing of the past.

Better stock up on shotgun shells before they get to be as scarce as .22 rimfire ammo.
shocked.gif


As for me, I think I'll just sit back, have another cold one, and watch the fun.
6qw5eh.gif
 
Drones are here as a new technology and they will stay!
My advice, take your tinfoil hat off and get used to it!
:D

Just like a rainy day, eh? Nothing we can do about it so may as well lay back and enjoy it? You are willing to give up your privacy too easily which concerns me not one whit. But you are willing to give up everyone else's too, which does. Keep your advice.
 
Well, about the only other thing I can think of to say about this whole drone issue and the apparently eminent Drone War Apocalypse is...keep watching the skies!

But hey, if you think drones are bad, you ain't seen nuthin' yet. Wait'll those remote controlled squirrels and birds start showing up...roosting in your trees and scampering all over your roofs at all hours of the day and night. Your privacy will be a thing of the past.

Better stock up on shotgun shells before they get to be as scarce as .22 rimfire ammo.
shocked.gif


As for me, I think I'll just sit back, have another cold one, and watch the fun.
6qw5eh.gif

Good timing on my part I guess, just ordered another case of 12ga buckshot yesterday!:D:D:D
 
I'm all for a lit'l common sense drone control,

Why not license drone pilots (and I use that term very loosely)
Register drones with the feds, restrict operating air space to designated R/C Air Parks for use.

Hell, wait a minute that sound like a bloomberg idee. :eek:

Well, the open season and no bag limit will cause the issue to correct it's self.

For those that won't shoot anything they don't eat....hows do you dress one of them thar drones anyhows???;):D:rolleyes:


.
 
Last edited:
I live in the country, so for me it would be fun wing shooting practice. Let me see a drone flying over my property, and my only issue will be should I use Dove, Pheasant, or Duck loads in my 12ga skeet gun. I'd be fun for sure; especially if the last thing the drone camera sees is my big SMILE :)
 
Whoa.. getting deep here... drug smuggling drones, probably speaking only mexican , just another good reason to shoot them down I'm thinking!!


Dope mule drones........quick sumbody call 9-Juan-Juan ;)





.
 
Last edited:
Local governments are precluded from legislating the use of airspace, and that is a good thing we must support.
As to a drone "spying" on a person, consider: Google Earth probably has a pic of your home, or three or four, from the street. In fact, anyone can walk or drive by your property and take pictures. You can't shoot them.

You can't shoot traffic surveillance cameras. People are prosecuted for vandalizing or stealing game cameras.

Hunters have been prosecuted for shooting drones used by anti-hunting groups.

I don't like the idea of drones over my property taking pictures. I especially think they are being used by child enticers, and someone else here mentioned people using drones to photograph women and girls in bikinis. A person on the beach or in a public park who takes pictures of people cannot be shot for it.

You are being photographed many many times in most cities. You can't shoot the cameras.

I think law will have to decide when a drone is "trespassing", as though a photographer had come onto your property. Fifty feet up? One hundred feet up? I expect law will have to cover the noise they make, too. Consider someone using loud music to disrupt a wedding, funeral or religious service.

EXPECT anti-gun creeps to use them to disrupt hunting, shooting competitions, and your day at the range with family. Start working out how - now - to fight them.

There may be a place for anti-drone drones. If I see one over my property I could launch my own that would harry it until it fell or left. I can, after all, shove a trespasser off my property. I could "arm" my drone with ribbons, confetti, oil squirters, etc., and release them in the way of the offending drone, "allowing" it to fly into them. My argument would be it was chasing mine. It would be just like flying in Vietnam!

We may not be able to legally use violence against drone users, but I see no reason why I couldn't harass them right back. Since they have, by regulation, limited range and must be operated line-of-sight, I could follow it to the user and take pictures of my own to post online, make it obvious I am taking pix of license plates, etc. Until drones become as ordinary as cars, newspapers and TV stations will love stories with photos of the privacy violators.
 
Just like a rainy day, eh? Nothing we can do about it so may as well lay back and enjoy it? You are willing to give up your privacy too easily which concerns me not one whit. But you are willing to give up everyone else's too, which does. Keep your advice.

Well, don't panic buddy...
When I say, "get used to it" I mean to the technology itself, not to the bad acts done by using that technology...

Like cell phones, I am sure you're not using one because it is traceable...
Like using Credit Cards, I am sure you don't even have one because it is traceable...
Like Internet, I am sure you never log on (wait a minute, never mind), which is traceable...
Like watching Cable TV or Satellite TV, which is traceable...
Like having a vehicle with GPS which is traceable...
and so on....

Again what were you saying?
Oh, you were talking about your unbreachable privacy before this evil drones?

Trust me and take my advice and stop shooting at drones like Yosemite Sam!
It'll only be good for you!
 
Local governments are precluded from legislating the use of airspace, and that is a good thing we must support.
As to a drone "spying" on a person, consider: Google Earth probably has a pic of your home, or three or four, from the street. In fact, anyone can walk or drive by your property and take pictures. You can't shoot them.

You can't shoot traffic surveillance cameras. People are prosecuted for vandalizing or stealing game cameras.

Hunters have been prosecuted for shooting drones used by anti-hunting groups.

I don't like the idea of drones over my property taking pictures. I especially think they are being used by child enticers, and someone else here mentioned people using drones to photograph women and girls in bikinis. A person on the beach or in a public park who takes pictures of people cannot be shot for it.

You are being photographed many many times in most cities. You can't shoot the cameras.

I think law will have to decide when a drone is "trespassing", as though a photographer had come onto your property. Fifty feet up? One hundred feet up? I expect law will have to cover the noise they make, too. Consider someone using loud music to disrupt a wedding, funeral or religious service.

EXPECT anti-gun creeps to use them to disrupt hunting, shooting competitions, and your day at the range with family. Start working out how - now - to fight them.

There may be a place for anti-drone drones. If I see one over my property I could launch my own that would harry it until it fell or left. I can, after all, shove a trespasser off my property. I could "arm" my drone with ribbons, confetti, oil squirters, etc., and release them in the way of the offending drone, "allowing" it to fly into them. My argument would be it was chasing mine. It would be just like flying in Vietnam!

We may not be able to legally use violence against drone users, but I see no reason why I couldn't harass them right back. Since they have, by regulation, limited range and must be operated line-of-sight, I could follow it to the user and take pictures of my own to post online, make it obvious I am taking pix of license plates, etc. Until drones become as ordinary as cars, newspapers and TV stations will love stories with photos of the privacy violators.

Excellent points!
 
I'd have done the same thing under the same circumstances.
Only difference is I can shoot where I live.
By the time the owner shows up that thing would have been gone, never to be found by anyone.
 
Saturday, August 01, 2015 06:37PM
NEW YORK (WABC) -- Federal officials are investigating after a pilot reported seeing an unmanned aircraft while approaching John F. Kennedy International Airport.

A Delta airplane preparing to land at JFK Friday had a close call with a drone.

A spokesman for Delta Airlines told Eyewitness News that flight 407 was heading from Orlando, Florida, to New York's JFK International Airport. The crew reported the an airborne object was near the plane as it made its approach to the runway.

The plane landed at about 5 p.m. without incident.

"We are investigating and cooperating fully with the Federal Aviation Administration," said the spokesman.

The FAA said the unmanned aircraft was seen off the right wing of the plane at 1,700 feet. The pilot did not take any evasive action.

Sources told ABC News the drone was about 100 feet from the plane.
 
The pilot did not take any evasive action.

I can't see a small drone affecting a heavy unless maybe it got ingested in an engine.
Flying one around a big airport is asking for the Feds to get interested in you.
 
How about: I was in my yard and this flying thing was coming straight at me and I feared for my life. I didn't know why it was heading towards me. Larry
 
The pilot did not take any evasive action.

I can't see a small drone affecting a heavy unless maybe it got ingested in an engine.
Flying one around a big airport is asking for the Feds to get interested in you.

Me neither. Breathless reports act as if drones are hovering dump trucks.
 
Google Earth probably has a pic of your home, or three or four, from the street. In fact, anyone can walk or drive by your property and take pictures. You can't shoot them.

Fake problem. Talk about people walking around our back yard and looking in our windows.
 
Back
Top