Another New Python Variant Announced

They improved the rear sight to make up for previous short comings. The front sights are user inter-changeable as are the grips. The only thing of note is the unfluted cylinder. Heavier weight makes sense for target shooting but doesn't make sense to me when the model appears to be a model geared towards carrying.
People who are obsessed about weight don't typically carry large steel frame revolvers. They'll carry an J-frame, K-frame, King Cobra, etc.... I believe the extra weight is there to mitigate recoil and increase follow up shot speed.

I purposely choose to EDC a M686 over a M66 for the extra weight and bulk being that I carry 357mag and not 38spc.

Are you bothered by the fact that they added some features out the box and gave the new configuration a different name? What firearm company, car company, or manufacturer doesn't do this? The difference between some revolvers and semiautos titled "target" and "carry" are typically only the shorter grip/barrel length and night sights vs adjustable sites. Many models get the new title and model number of "LE" denoting it's the new law enforcement version when all that changed are night sights and an extra magazine... I'm failing to see what your issue is in the case of Colt?
 
Last edited:
It would be even better for you, The Norseman, if it were chambered for 454 Casull instead. You could still shoot your 45 Colt in it and could make some sure enough bad boy ammo with the Casull. After all, they made the cylinder long enough to do so.
 
I've owned three Colt Pythons: a 1971 vintage 4" nickel, a 2021 4" stainless, and a 2023 6" stainless.

I was excited to buy my '71, and Frank Glenn looked it over and gave it the two thumbs up, so I knew that it was a well tuned example ... and indeed, it had a very smooth action.

But on the firing line? The new Pythons blew the old Python out of the water. Not even a contest.

I know that the old Pythons have the lore of being handmade and hand fitted guns. But as I learned years ago with cars and motorcycles, handmade usually just means it's going to cost more to keep up. Give me a "cheap" L or N frame and I'll be much happier.

Mike
 
I am not sure putting a vented rib on a barrel and slapping the name "python" on it really makes it a colt python?
 
I am not sure putting a vented rib on a barrel and slapping the name "python" on it really makes it a colt python?

It's a Colt revolver designed and made by Colt's Manufacturing Company in West Hartford, Connecticut, with the Python frame, the Python action, the Python trigger, the Python cylinder relase, the Python barrel, Python grips ...

Maybe you could elaborate on what makes a revolver a Colt Python in your opinion? Thanks!
 
Kudos must go to CZ management. It has done quite well with all of CZ moves in the past few years. Yes, I am a CZ owner and have followed its moves for awhile and it is clearly aiming at solidifying its market presence in the U.S. Competition is good.

My two...
 
Mark8 , I guess I painted my words with too broad a brush , what I meant is that when I heard colt was bringing back the python I was hoping for the old royal blue and/or nickel finish with close to the same smooth action. I do give them credit for trying different things and of course my taste are just that mine. Are the new guns colts....of course they are , just not the ones I remember thats all.
 
Last edited:
Just me…
I love CZ pistols and am happy they are reinvigorating the “Colt Python” under their new management. This bodes well for the new generation of shooters, to have a current production, (ostensibly) quality revolver to get familiar with.
I, on the other hand, still hold onto my romantic notions (yeah, go ahead and laugh!) for the original Python. What can I say? I’m almost 60 and own a similar vintage 6” blue’d example, from 1981, that I shot in high school. So, I’m a little sentimental, too.
If it’s your “thing,” then more power to you.
It’s just not mine.
-Bill
 
Just me…
I love CZ pistols and am happy they are reinvigorating the “Colt Python” under their new management. This bodes well for the new generation of shooters, to have a current production, (ostensibly) quality revolver to get familiar with.
I, on the other hand, still hold onto my romantic notions (yeah, go ahead and laugh!) for the original Python. What can I say? I’m almost 60 and own a similar vintage 6” blue’d example, from 1981, that I shot in high school. So, I’m a little sentimental, too.
If it’s your “thing,” then more power to you.
It’s just not mine.
-Bill

Accuracy is the major concern for me with any handgun. I had two original Pythons for many years; sold both in the last couple of years. I suppose they were reasonably accurate but nothing special. Neither gun was quite as accurate as my two Colt 3-5-7 models or my .357 Trooper.

I'd like to try one of the "new" Pythons just to see how well they shoot.
 
Potentially more problematic is the increased momentum (mass x velocity) of the unfluted cylinder, however slight. Makes it harder on the stop notches, cylinder stop, etc. to stop the cylinder's rotation. This can result in the peening of the aforementioned parts. This was an issue with the 627, thus the longer stop notches and bolt of the 627-0. Not sure if the new Colts are engineered to handle this.
 
Back
Top