Are Colt Pythons that good.......

I've had both Colts and Smiths apart. In my opinion, the Colt is an older and less robust design. I'll take the Smith & Wesson every time.
 
One of my shooters is a consummate salesman. He's the man selling ice to Eskimos. His number 1 selling tactic is...Tell them they can't have it. Uh huh..works everytime. RMs, Triple Locks, unRMs and pre 27s,pre 29s, they are all picking up steam. Better has nothing to do with the Colt's prices. There aren't any more and won't BE any more. Buyers are dealing in a finite number. Want one?? Pay up!! Just don't fall for the BETTER gig. And remember, look out for the ...You can't have it line! That's what makes neardowells part with a stack of Hunnies. I have lotsa Colts but not because I think they are better.
 
Python Tapered Bore & Silver Ball Treatment

So far, unless I missed it, no mention of the Python barrels were famous for workmanship. The Python barrel has a tapered bore and had the legendary, mysterious "Silver ball" treatment.
All this means an extremely smooth barrel, with near-perfect rifling.
What was the silver ball treatment, and did they have a tapered bore, .001 or so?
Wasn't this why the Smythons used Python barrels?
 
Seems like I read about the tapered bore. All I jnow for a fact is the HBWC shoots very small groups in my Python.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
"There aren't any more and won't BE any more. Buyers are dealing in a finite number. Want one?? Pay up!! Just don't fall for the BETTER gig."

For many years there has been a saying to the effect that if you are a collector, you should buy Colts but if you are a shooter, you should buy S&Ws. Colt has been out of the DA revolver business for 17 years, and there's not even a slim chance that they will ever re-enter that market. So the number of Colt DAs in circulation right now is all there ever will be. Sort of like Picasso won't be creating any more works of art (another story - in 1970 I had a chance to buy a number of authentic Picasso drawings at what today would be considered really dirt-cheap prices, but didn't). And with scarcity comes increasing prices, so long there are more collectors chasing Colt DAs than there are Colt DAs to chase. And most Colt collectors aren't the least bit concerned about mundane things like alleged timing problems or whether Colts are "better" than S&Ws.
 
Last edited:
The colt Python is like one of those Italian sports cars, there so purdy. I haven't shot my ruger Redhawk in 357, my S&W m27-2 nor my S&W m28. With my same exact 140gr Speer reloads. That's the only way I can compare them.
 
The two turn offs on Pythongs other than price is the way the lock work will wear and go out of time if proper lubrication is kept up and then if you take the gun apart. A S&W is simple to take apart and reassemble, the Colts however make you wonder why the parts are so complicated in doing what they do. I'm life I have owned and fired about 20 Pythons and never had any 2 with identical feeling actions. In the end it's more about taste. I have S&W's and I have Colt's, they're not comparable but I like them all. I even have an old Shooting Master 38 to go with my 38-44 revolvers.
 
As I mentioned earlier,I wish I had bought a python when they were more in line with a new Smith & Wesson as far as pricing.Seems that the most expensive ones are the ones in Ultimate Stainless finish. I think the best looking finish,but also the worse finish to get unless it's kept untouched.No sense blaming the Internet ,or gun forums for rumors of feeble lock work.Almost every gun writer back in the day reviewing the Python ended with comments on the lock work.I still think that the Python is Colts best gun.And if I ever had one I would never shoot it,since parts are scarce,and hard to find anyone to work on one.But let's be honest here.The world has come to Armageddon and you can only have your pick of one .357 Magnum to Handle all of your needs for the rest of your life.I know I wouldn't be grabbing a Python.
 
Last edited:
I've owned both the Pythons, 4 or 5 and half a dozen 29's. The Pythons are better 357's and the 29's are better 44 Mags.

The Python has a choked bbl which is said to give better accuracy. I've also owned many 19's and 27's, a few of them would shoot with a Python all day long.

For the extra money you get a COLT, you get a firearm that is no longer made and a piece of history.

If I was rich I'd own a bunch of both......
 
There is utility value, monetary value - which is often based more on collector value or prestige than production cost - and then there is personal preference.

When I compare my revolvers, a Ruger GP100, a S&W 686, a Colt Python, and a Korth there is little enough difference in accuracy, reliability, or shootability. Of course, I wouldn't have ended up with fifteen Korths if there wouldn't have been a special emotional bond with them but I have the same number of pre-lock S&W revolvers.

From a shooter's standpoint, and especially a shooter's on a budget standpoint, neither the Colt, nor the Korth is worth the price difference over a Ruger - but then, why aren't we all over on the Rugerforum??? :):):)
 
I think the python is a great revolver...I have several I shoot and several I do not (like my smiths) I also find the anaconda's are great shooters.I have never had a mechanical with any colt and think they are as sturdy as a S&W.Are the pythons overpriced?Yep no doubt.i'm not paying that kind of money for one now but...I am very glad I have my colts
 
Back in the "Old Days" (I'm 74), a ventilated rib, usually on shotguns, was considered "top drawer"...something you wanted to own. Hence, part of the appeal of a Python.
 
"Are the pythons overpriced? Yep no doubt."

You cannot make a blanket statement that anything is overpriced so long as someone is willing to pay that price. Pythons (like many other luxury goods) may be out of reach for those of limited financial means, but there are many individuals having high disposable income for whom the price means little, and for those, if they want one (and obviously many do), they buy it.
 
To Me Their Action is Smoother,I have A 80's Stainless Python 4" & A Mid 80's S&W 686 2.5" While The S&W may be more Durable The Colt is Way Smoother


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I think the colt Python will always be in a class above all the rest of the 357 magnums after all it's a colt.
 
Are Colt Pythons that good? simple answer --- yes. I love my Smiths, but they don't compare to the fit and finish of a Python.
 
I have owned many Colts, never could like them. Still have two, one a US Army single action custom built by Krull and the other a 1911 custom by Amend Swenson. They are both great firearms.

I was glad to see the others go.

The vent rib was a big selling point, but I never saw heat waves bother my sight picture so figure it was just an ornament rather than useful part of the tool.
 
My Dad used his 6" .357 Colt New Service w/ King sights and tuned action .....for shooting slow fire bullseye in the Pittsburgh Police Pistol League ( 50s-60-70s) with his own .38 wadcutters handloads.
OMG, I'm shooting a $2,000 Bullseye revolver.
Bam-Bam, I've been shooting in the MPRL (Metropolitan Police Revolver League) in Pittsburgh since about 1990. Shooting the Python Target 38 since the mid-90's. My first team, Davey-Dravo, was in the Southside police station basement range. The firemen used to complain we were disturbing them. Had to get out due to remodeling and never invited back. I have a second 38 Python I use in an open-sight winter double/action league. That said, my friend has a very accurate 66 with one of the nicest triggers I've tried. If I did not have the Python, I'd probably try an 8" 686. I need the full lug and long barrel for weight to work against the D/A pull.
EDIT: I'm not LEO, MPRL is mostly civilians now. One of the League shooters is an LEO with a 625 as duty weapon.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0175.jpg
    IMG_0175.jpg
    102.2 KB · Views: 43
Last edited:
My 2 cents, I have had a Python since the 70's. Superbly accurate. I use to brag if I can see it I can hit it. (140 gr. Speers as previously posted). The only point I dislike is the stock grip. I now have a 686+(performance center) to compare it to. Didn't like the grip on it either. Still working up an accurate load. I wont trade for either.
 
Back
Top