Are Colt Pythons that good.......

[chud333]

A Python is a fine handgun. I have but one,
a 6" stainless model. I wouldn't trade it for
4 L-frames as i wanted a Python.
It is 98% and it will get
shot at the range. I horse traded my way into
it and i've got all of 900 dollars invested in it.
I have wanted one for ages but was not going
to spend 2K plus for a shooting gun.
It is a fine piece of quality workmanship from
days gone by.
If you asked this question on the Colt forum your
answers would be flip flopped 180 degrees.
I buy and shoot S&W and Colt revolvers because
that is what i appreciate the most and have had
good luck with them. I also like Ruger revolvers but
currently have none in my safe.
It's apples and oranges folks.
The prices on quality built revolvers is what is shocking
to me these days. Yes, the Pythons are high but so are
the Smith pre-27's and 29's. They won't be getting any
cheaper either.



Chuck

 

[Ed Fowler]

Very well said sir!

 

[The Norseman]

Colt Pythons not for me

Been watching this Topic. Thought I'd chime in.
You all have bought up the so many reasons I
don't like the Python.

The only Colt I even consider and search for is the
Colt Single Action Army New Frontier (w/adj sight)
and the plain Colt SAA.

I have only owned Smith & Wesson and some Rugers
so that's where my loyalties are. Colt needs to get
their act together with the SAA because of that I'm out.

 

[sigp220.45]

Disregard previous optimism. Rick has his Python back.

 

[Arik]

Disregard previous optimism. Rick has his Python back.

Prices just went up again!

And if he kills Negen with it...... forget about it!

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk

 

[jack the toad]

Having owned only a few Pythons and Colt DA's over the years, I'm not an expert by any means. So I won't tout the mechanics, accuracy, etc. of them compared to other DA revolvers. On looks alone, I've learned to accept full-lug barrels but not the vented top straps. Seriously though and I've said this before, I wish I had them all back so could sell them again at today's prices.

 

[DHENRY]

Over the years I've owned (and used ) many 27's, pre-27's, 28's, R.M.s and a 686.
Likewise, had three Pythons.
All fine revolvers, but NOTHING locks up like a Colt.
Nothing.
S & W and Colt are great in their own areas.
Don

 

[bc1023]

Colt Pythons are beautiful examples of the gun-maker's art. But in terms of mechanical "beauty"? Not so much.

The trigger pull is overly long and heavy. The lockwork is overly complex. The CALIBER is certainly spot on!

I LOVE the "look" of the Colt Python. But in terms of function a M686 7 shot has it hands down all over the Python.

To be honest, a Taurus M65/66 has it hands down over the Python....

BUT...as with all other things labeled "COLT" THAT's what you're paying the premium for! So it's up to YOU to determine if the number is right for you!

Incorrect. Many Colts sell for cheap.

The Python is a special revolver in the eyes of many. The other Colt snakes aren't very good, but the Python is very nice in my opinion. I love the action, which reminds me of many pre war Colt revolvers.

No way I'd take a 686 or, especially a Taurus, over a Colt Python.

 

[Mistered]

I will readily admit the Python is a fine gun. But I think it is over hyped.

Overpriced also - at a recent gunshow the lowest price I saw was $2500 for one with a few others in the $3000 - $3500 range - and no one was in line for them!

 

[Eddie Southgate]

Never liked them. I do own and shoot Colts and although I have never owned one myself I have shot a fair number of Pythons and Diamondbacks and they just don't suit me. I do not however for one second believe that Smith's are better built than Colts or the other way around either. One is just as good as the other.

Eddie

 

[bc1023]

Overpriced also - at a recent gunshow the lowest price I saw was $2500 for one with a few others in the $3000 - $3500 range - and no one was in line for them!

They sell for that online all the time. They aren't overpriced. That's market value.