Back in '03 (sounds old, doesn't it?), I was in a friend's gun shop when he got his first Armscor, a military model that retailed at $300. He was wondering how it compared to his Springfield Mil-Spec, so we stripped both of them down to bare parts and examined them.
There were 12 or 13 places where the Armscor was better, including trigger pull and smoothness, barrel crown, slide-to-frame fit, barrel lug fit, link fit, sights, magazine quality, and others (all for $100 less) and no place where it rated worse. I've heard nothing in the intervening years that would make me change my mind. The Armscor is a quality gun at a good price point. One could do worse.
Buck