Article on the Model 1892 Winchester Rifle

Joined
Jan 24, 2007
Messages
10,358
Reaction score
51,882
Location
Arizona
As many of you know, I write "classic firearms" articles for Dillon's Blue Press magazine/catalog, where I am a contributing editor. I've just recently drafted a piece on the Winchester Model 1892, and I thought I'd post it here for any comments, particularly from those who are very knowledgeable on the arm. All comments and/or criticisms are most welcome. Thanks!

John

------------------------------------------------------

BROWNING_1892-1280.jpg


The Model 1892 Winchester lever action rifle, designed by John Browning, is widely regarded as perhaps the smoothest, handiest and most attractive lever action rifle ever produced. Today the originals are collector classics and modern versions of it are still being made all over the world. Conceived as a light rifle for lower-powered cartridges, with modern metallurgy it’s strong enough to handle more potent rounds such as the .44 Remington magnum and the .454 Casull. Cowboy action shooters love it for its quick handling and reliability. Hunters find it just the ticket for shooting medium game in the brush. It’s the 19th Century version of an “assault rifle,” as many shots can be triggered off rapidly. As actor Chuck Connors showed in the TV western series “The Rifleman,” a modified version could be made to fire almost as fast as a machine gun. Famed gun writer Jeff Cooper once touted it as an almost ideal home defense weapon.

How the gun came to be is an interesting story. Let me take you back in time to the year 1892, and let’s eavesdrop on an (admittedly apocryphal) conversation between famed firearms inventor John Browning and his visiting guest T.G. Bennett, Oliver Winchester’s son-in-law. Bennett, who was then President and General Manager of Winchester Repeating Arms, had already established an alliance with Browning in the design and manufacture of a number of firearms. He had come to Ogden, Utah Territory, to discuss a need and to seal a deal with Browning.

“John,” said Bennett, “Winchester, as always, has been very pleased with the excellent work you’ve done for us over the past years. Your big Model 1886 lever action rifle in particular has been a terrific success. It’s strong and smooth, and we’ve been able to chamber it for some pretty powerful cartridges like the .45-70 Government. But today I want to talk to you about designing another rifle for us. As you know, we’ve been producing our Model 1873 for 19 years. It was designed to handle lower-powered cartridges like the .44-40 W.C.F. and 38-40 W.C.F. which have also been usable in handguns. Of course we’ve done well with it, but we’ve decided we’d like to replace it with something smaller, lighter, handier, and stronger. It would be an ideal new companion rifle for revolver shooters who like to use the same cartridges in both their rifles and handguns.”

“Tom,” said Browning, I’ve been thinking about something along those lines already. A rifle like that would really be something. It would be extremely versatile and I bet you could have used something that handy during your service in the Civil War.”

“You are exactly right, John. I would have loved to have had such a rifle back then. We’re in a more modern age now, and with our increased manufacturing capability and better steels, we’re ready to make a fine replacement for the Model 1873. We just need your design skills to get this project rolling.”

“What do you propose?” Browning replied. “We’ve been thinking,” said Bennett, “that something like a scaled-down Model 1886 might be just the ticket. It’s the smoothest rifle we’ve ever made, and a smaller version of it would be, in our opinion, ideal.” “Agreed,” Browning replied. “Tell me, what would you propose for my compensation for this new design?” Bennett stroked his chin and said “We’re anxious to get started on this project, John. In addition to our usual agreement, we are prepared to offer you a bonus of ten thousand dollars if you can deliver a working prototype in ninety days. If you can do it in sixty days, I’ll see to it that you get fifteen thousand. How does that sound to you?” Browning thought it over for a moment. “Tom, I’ll tell you what. If I can deliver it in one month or less, you will owe me a bonus of twenty thousand dollars. If I can’t, it will be free. Do you want to take me up on my bet?”

Now twenty thousand dollars was a lot of money in those days, but Bennett was anxious to get going and the deal was struck. Browning, working diligently and making good on his bet, did deliver a functioning prototype in under a month. For both Browning and Winchester, the Model 1892 proved to be an incredible success.

Essentially, the rifle did away with the knee-action locking system of the Model 1873 and replaced that with two vertically-moving locking columns that dovetailed into the rear of the breechblock and the receiver. This made for a very strong and smooth action that could be housed in a more compact receiver.

The rifle was comfortable to handle and carried well in the hand or in a saddle scabbard. 1,004,675 of them were produced from 1892 to 1932, and they continued to be sold through 1941. The Model 1892 was offered in several configurations, among them rifles, takedowns, carbines, shorter “trapper” carbines and long-barreled “muskets.” The calibers used in the Model 92 and its similar siblings, the Models 53 and 65, were many. These included .44-40, 38-40, .32-20, .25-20, and .218 Bee. Custom guns could be had on order from the factory, with octagonal barrels, half round and half octagonal barrels, special barrel lengths, different sights, fancy finish and wood, special buttplate styles, engraving, and even gold inlays being available. Collectors salivate today over some of the rare ones that have survived in good condition. After production of the ’92 ceased, it was never revived at the factory in New Haven, Connecticut.

A Spanish copy of the ’92 was made by Garate, Anitua y Cia., based in Eibar, from 1915 to 1938. Known as El Tigre, it was widely distributed and popular in South America.

Hollywood latched right on to the Model ’92. John Wayne, in the classic 1939 western movie “Stagecoach” wielded a special short-barreled ’92 with a large-loop lever, twirling it expertly with one hand to actuate it. I’ve examined the similar gun he used in "True Grit" personally, and it’s a real smooth-operating honey. The ’92 was a natural in calibers .44-40 and .38-40 for firing the popular 5-in-1 blanks used in the movies for a number of guns. It was rare not to see the readily available ’92 in movies and TV westerns.

After World War II, consumer demand for the slick little ’92 didn’t cease, and a number of other manufacturers jumped in to fill the void by making virtual carbon copies of Browning’s superb design. These are often found, besides the original chamberings, in calibers such as .45 Colt, .357 magnum, .44 magnum, and even the stomping .454 Casull. Rossi makes excellent ‘92s in Brazil, often found stamped "Puma." Their more recent rifles deviate from the original design with a rotating safety on top of the rear of the breechblock. I have an early Rossi carbine (without the safety thingy) in .357 magnum chambering, and I find it very pleasant to shoot with either .357s or .38 specials. It’s one of my personal favorites, and I think it’s an ideal companion piece for any .357 or .38 special handgun. In a rifle, the .357 magnum approaches the power level of the popular .30-30 cartridge.

Chiappa Firearms has made ‘92s in Italy. Browning Arms Company markets high-quality ‘92s made in Japan. A Browning ’92 carbine made in 1983 is illustrated for this article. It’s in .44 magnum caliber, and of course it will also take the easier-on-the-shoulder .44 specials. It’s quite true to the original design, except that it has the trademark gold-plated trigger of many Browning firearms. John Browning designed the gun with only a half-cock safety, and so that’s the way this one was produced. Winchester has resurrected the Model 1892 in recent years. These new ‘92s are made in Japan in several configurations: “sporting rifle,” “carbine,” “trapper’s carbine,” and “musket.” These recent Winchesters have lawyer-friendly sliding safeties on the upper tang behind the hammer. Collectors ardently pursue any Winchester ’92 in good working condition, and the high prices asked for them reflect this demand. For those anxious to know more about their original ’92s, the factory records are available at the Cody Firearms Museum in Cody, Wyoming, from serial number 1 through 379999.

Luckily for anyone wanting a Model ’92 in a more modern caliber, affordable quality reproductions of the original Winchesters are available almost everywhere. John Browning’s masterpiece design has lived on for 120 years, and shows no sign of becoming obsolete. It will probably still be around well into the 22nd Century!

(c) 2012 JLM
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
I think the '92 is a true classic. Knowing from Sasha Siemel's writing that it was/is popular in Brazil, I armed a heroine in some fan fiction stories with one, a standard carbine with nice wood in .44/40. It fits the 1920's time frame of those fics perfectly, and she finds it to be ideal for shooting such items as brocket deer and Indian headhunters at jungle ranges.

Siemel had at least one M-92, a short carbine, with he was pictured. He used it on big jaguars, sometmes preferring it to his famous spear.

Outside of the USA and Brazil, the '92 was popular in Australia, where repressive laws prevented most people from owning rifles in more powerful calibers.

I saw a kid who's just 13 work a replica '73 on the TV show, "American Guns." He had the shop from the program build him a version with a short-stroke lever action, and he shot it as fast as Lucas McCain did that '92 on, "The Rifleman". And he was hitting his targets, too! I think an M-92 would have been an even better platform for his skills.

I favor bolt-action rifles, but the M-'92 is one of the few lever guns that have tempted me. I think it's a superb urban defense rifle. Based on what my son told me of shooting insurgents in Iraq with his M-4 carbine, I think the M-92's available calibers would be about as effective or more so at average home defense ranges. And it has enough power for cougars and black bears, if your home has problems like those...

Great story, John. I read it all, and liked it. You are to gun writing what your illustrious ancestor was to the judicial system.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for an excellent short "bio" of the Model 1892, which is my absolute favorite carbine I don't happen to own an example of. :)
 
The blanks were "5-in-1", not "3-in-1". Not because they worked in three calibers of guns, but because they worked in five gun. 38, 44 and 45 pistols and 38 and 44 rifles.
 
Unless space is an issue, an article on the 1892/92 really should include the Model 53 and the Model 65. Both were variations of the 92 and had relatively short production runs. The 53 was an update version that replaced the 92 rifle and the 65 was basically a standardized 53 geared more toward varmint hunters. The 92 rifle and the model 53 were also offered in takedown versions.

I'd also caution about claims that the 92 was offered in .218 Bee. The Bee was introduced in the Model 65 which came after the 53. I've seen a few 92's chambered for the Bee and they were rifles that had either 65 Barrels or 92 barrels that were obviously remarked.

Model 53
000_1813.jpg


Model 65 in .218 Bee
000_1810.jpg
 
Last edited:
I love the 92. My old worn Browning .44 (top photo) that I found very used in a pawn shop twenty five years ago is a fantastic little gun. The action is much smoother than my very smooth 1905 44-40 (bottom photo). Can you count all the special features on that old takedown? Paladin. Are you the guy on TV who represents Dillon, I think, who talks about classic guns?
003-5.jpg


DSCN0556.jpg
 
A very nice article! I had one of the earlier Puma '92s in .45 Colt. It was a great little rifle, one that I sold when I needed money (That is no longer in the playbook!). I miss the rifle, and am looking for a replacement. IMHO, it is a better, handier design than the '94.
 
I really liked the comments and suggestions, which were most helpful. I do have a space limitation, but I have tried to briefly incorporate some of the items mentioned in the original post and the draft article. Good show! Thanks! I do appreciate you guys!

John
 
I don't believe that the .44-40 and .38-40 were originally handgun cartridges. They were designed by Winchester and first used in the Winchester 1873 before Colt chambered their Single Action for them. Admittedly they were not powerful rifle cartridges by today's standards. They were much more powerful than the .44 Henry of the Winchester 1866, the predecessor of the 1873.

Winchester was also facing strong competition from Marlin in 1888 with their new Model 1888 lever action rifle and later with the Marlin Model 1889. The Marlin 1888 was very far advanced compared to the Winchester 1873. The action of the 1888 is even smoother than the Winchester 1892. Marlin ended the production of the top eject 1888 a year later with the introduction of the side eject 1889. Winchester needed an improved lever action rifle in ,44-40 and .38-40 in order to compete. The Winchester Model 1892 was born to compete against Marlin.
 
That's true. In your hypothetical conversation, "It was designed to handle pistol cartridges like the .44-40 W.C.F. and 38-40 W.C.F.".

But the 44/40 was designed for the 1873 rifle. So was the 38/40 and the 32/20. They are, all three, "rifle cartridges", and are still listed as such today. Check Remington and Winchester ammo lists. Those three are listed as rifle ammo. Check reloading dies. Those three are listed with the rifle calibers.

The 44 and 38 WCF never were, and still aren't "pistol cartridges". Saying they are pistol rounds because they were chambered in the Colt is like saying 45/70 is because it is chambered in the BFR, or 35 Remington is because it is chambered in the Contender.
 
I like my Rossi M92 .44mag carbine.

Simple to use...all you need is the gun and a box of ammo..stainless construction is a big plus in my book...makes an excellent short-range pig stomper.
 
I don't believe that the .44-40 and .38-40 were originally handgun cartridges. They were designed by Winchester and first used in the Winchester 1873 before Colt chambered their Single Action for them. Admittedly they were not powerful rifle cartridges by today's standards. They were much more powerful than the .44 Henry of the Winchester 1866, the predecessor of the 1873.

Winchester was also facing strong competition from Marlin in 1888 with their new Model 1888 lever action rifle and later with the Marlin Model 1889. The Marlin 1888 was very far advanced compared to the Winchester 1873. The action of the 1888 is even smoother than the Winchester 1892. Marlin ended the production of the top eject 1888 a year later with the introduction of the side eject 1889. Winchester needed an improved lever action rifle in ,44-40 and .38-40 in order to compete. The Winchester Model 1892 was born to compete against Marlin.

Good points! I'm changing the wording (see the OP) so that will be more accurate. Thanks!

John
 
Last edited:
Paladin, as noted above, the Win 65 was an offshoot of the 92, but when looking for a nice 65, I ran across more 92s converted to .218 Bee apparently using a 92 action with a 65 front end than I did finding actual 65s. Generally well outside of the 65 SN range. It would indicate a fair number of 65 bbl assemblys were made and sold unassembled on an action. Since the 65s date to the 1930s, I doubt anyone alive would be able to shed light on this. The problem is, by accident, or on purpose, they are too often offered as 65s. A "heads up" may be in order.
 
John-

As a writer, I like the way you "fixed" the reference to "handgun cartridges." Neatly done.
 
John-

As a writer, I like the way you "fixed" the reference to "handgun cartridges." Neatly done.

Thanks. Each article I do might be a "work in progress" for as much as several weeks, with constant (and to me, frustrating) revisions. I do take pains to get my facts straight, and that's why I really like the opportunity to get constructive critique from knowledgeable folks such as are found here on the S&W forum. I also run the final draft by my wife, who is a good stand-in for not-so-savvy folks, and if anything isn't understandable by her, she alerts me. Then I may do a "clarity" revision to make it more understandable or readable. Still, the real challenge usually is to get a ton of info into the limited space available in the centerfold section of the Blue Press. Often I have to trim things a bit to get it all to fit, and when I do so, I regret having to omit certain things I'd like to include. To his credit, the editor-in-chief almost always just prints the articles as submitted with no changes. He expects, and I try to deliver, something that is interesting, factual and readable by both enthusiasts and casual readers.

Again, I appreciate all the input!

John
 
The Model 65 - 1939 Winchester catalog listing

In doing research on the '92, I thumbed through my copy of the Winchester 1939 catalog. Neither the '92 nor the Model 53 were listed for sale, but the Model 65 was. The .218 Bee was featured quite prominently for this rifle. Here's a pic of the relevant page.

John

WINCHESTER_65-1939_CATALOGJPG.jpg
 
John Wayne's Model '92 Winchester

As I mentioned in the OP, I've had the privilege of examining the Winchester Model '92 used by John Wayne in True Grit. I thought you might like to see a picture of it - that's me displaying it in the color photo; I'm sure you recognize the other guy, holding the first version modified by stuntman Yakima Canutt for Stagecoach. The later one had a slightly different loop configuration.

JOHN_WAYNE-WIN_1892.jpg
Stagecoach-rifle3.jpg
 
Last edited:
Back
Top