I am sorry,, but I can't stop laughing, really, I am having trouble typing this as I chuckle.
No, it's not the gun, gun looks cool, no its not the price, definitely. If you want it and want to spend any amount, hey go ahead.
Its these NAMES. Atlas Erebus, Demolita, Bird Flu, Platypus. you got to be kidding. And I used to be into Greek mythology.
What ever happened to the HoseFest 2000, or the Never-miss Dlux.
Daniel Boone at least had "Tick Licker" hinting at its accuracy, I think. and Crockett had Ol "Betsy". Ok enough of that, I am ok now.
Just looking at the website any real info is pretty vague. The same claims every costly gunmaker claims. This one probable has the least info. Except you will have to reload perfect ammo with special powder to get this gun to run and shoot up to its ability. Never have seen that one before. No accuracy guarantee other than extremely accurate. By who's standards. Maybe they are really popular at USPSA or 3-gun matches but I doubt there are many of them there for people to test fire.
I shot pretty serious competitions for over 30 years. A lot of very nice custom guns. Most had all the same attributes. so, it was and is a personal feeling and choice. Of course, if you pick up a gun and shoot crazy good with it, that's probably the one you like. I think it's very hard to state "this is the best gun made". A lot of custom guns are very reliable, very accurate, and have good triggers. If they didn't, there would be a lot of gun plumbers working at someone else's machine shop.
As far as shooting flat and returning to point of aim. As long as the guns bore axis wasn't way different, they were all about the same. Now ammo made a big difference. We shot a lot of WW 9mm 105 lead free ammo. That runs about 1350 FPS from a 4" barrel. The early P/C guns loved it. Very little muzzle climb, very accurate, 1.5" out to 50 yards, in the 5" guns. Less than 1" at 25 in the 4" and even the Shorty 9.