I’ve personally been a big fan of the Beretta 92 series pistols, and the 92S is one of my favorites, mostly due to the beautiful blued finish they have versus the Brunition finish they come with these days. Thing to be aware of on the 92S however: it has a heel mag release on the lower left side of the grip frame as opposed to a US-style release. This is not a problem for most users, and All standard Beretta Mags are still slotted for the heel release catch. Be aware however that the grip frame has a different contour than the 92FS/M9, so whereas the newer mags with plastic base plates fit the gun and work flawlessly, the base plate will stick forward of the grip a little bit. The base please can be swapped out with metal ones, as I had done, sourcing them from Numrich’s inventory of Taurus PT-92 parts.
Also be aware most of the 92S pistols are setup with low-profile sights, which offer a much smaller sight picture than the standard 92FS. He bulk of the 92S’s available for sale are Italian military and police surplus guns that were built that way to reduce snagging when drawn from a holster. There are commercial 92S pistols around, and I had one of these, that have the standard sights on them, but these are far less common. Those commercial models were imported by the Berben Corp. in the early 80s, and tend to cost a bit more than the surplus guns. Anyway, they’re damn fine guns, and real blast to shoot. I would grab one before they inevitably increase in price a stocks run down...
Also, if you are I. The market for a good first 9mm pistol, have you considered a S&W 59, 459, or 5906 for around the same price? I like the Berettas but I vastly prefer the 39/59 series to the 92 any day. Just a thought...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk