best SD 22LR ammo for wife

Joined
Dec 16, 2017
Messages
40
Reaction score
100
Location
Almost as South as you ca
My wife bought a snub 22 revolver 1.78" barrel. I have no bloody idea what is considered the best SD ammo out there. Googleing just presents myriad so called experts who all have different answers & thoughts & I'm just plain stumped.
If the only revolver you had was a snub 22, what would you want to trust to do the best job for you. Please include the weight & type of bullet you'd use. Remember, this is for your wife/GF/sister etc. All answers are welcome.
 
Register to hide this ad
My wife has very bad arthritis so her home defense gun is a Model 18 revolver. She cant pull the trigger double action but can thumb cock it and shoot. She is VERY accurate with it out to 15 yards or so... routinely hits clay pigeons at that distance all day long.

I tried several different rounds but settled on the Winchester Varmint HE with the segmenting hollow point. the testing I have done on milk jugs full of water and wet news print lead me to believe that one or two of those in the chest will stop all but the most determined intruder.
 
If it were me, I would go with a CCI mini-mag solid (or similar round) for penetration. As a hunter I use HP rounds on small game and in that role they work well but did not provide the penetration that I would want in a defensive round. I've typically had them stop after approximately 5" of penetration. In one instance I used them to administer a coup de grace on a deer. An errant shot to neck muscle penetrated less than 2". I'll grant that at snub nose velocities a HP is less likely to expand and limit penetration but if that the case, why chose a HP? The hypervelocity rounds out of a handgun do wonders on snakes but again, limit penetration on larger body mass.

YMMV , just my observations.
 
I occasionally carry a 22lr, and I load it with CCI Velocitor. Alternatively, MiniMag solids.

Velocitors are 10 percent heavier and 14 percent faster. They supposedly use GDHP tech. I would not expect expansion from my 43c. But heavier and faster is heavier and faster.
 

Attachments

  • 20180715_113810.jpg
    20180715_113810.jpg
    65.2 KB · Views: 80
I would honestly switch them to a .38 special loaded with low recoil, standard pressure ammunition.
 
From what I've reads far, the CCI ammo seems to be an overwhelming choice. The only one I don't have is this frangible one. I'll try them all out with my wife & see which one works best for her.
Thanks everyone.
 
I’d just use standard velocity solids.

I’ve never found the higher velocity or theoretically expanding bullets to perform better (frequently they don’t perform as well) than standard velocity ammo on living beasties when fired from a handgun.
 
tried that & it was a complete total bust.

How so?

My mother(74) and my grandmother(91) can manage low recoiling standard pressure .38 special in the context of civilian self-defense shooting. Both have arthritic hands and my grandmother has some nerve issues as well.
 
Winchester makes a Super-X load in a 40 grain copper-plated hollow point that is rated at about 1,400 feet-per-second out of a rifle.
Should do around 1,000 fps or so out of a short barrel.
Comes in 100 round plastic boxes.
Don't know if some of the special frangibles do anything better than the Winchester Super-X at lower pistol velocities, and they cost more, and often sacrifice bullet weight.
With .22 LR it's all about shot placement and penetration for self-defense work. Expansion is great if it does not hinder penetration too much.

Don't let anyone tell you that a .22 is useless for defense because it does so little damage.
I was shot with one ( CCI 37 or 40 grain hollow point Mini-Mag ) by accident 3 years ago with a little Taurus pop-up barrelled pistol close-up ( about 4 inches ) and it's no fun.
I suspect a standard velocity round nose load of any kind would work well enough too.
 
Last edited:
Certainly lots of opinion above.
I have a SW317 .22LR snub which is basically a ***. It may be able to get through one cylinder, maybe not (aluminum cylinder swells). I would strongly recommend taking the revolver and potential cartridges for a good shakedown before trusting.

On ammo, the reason to test is I found dramatically different performance based on .22 cartridges. Aguila 60gr sounds impressive, but would tumble at five yards. Tumbling sounds good, but might get me five inches of penetration. It also shoots three plus inches off from POA at five yards.

Best POA in my particular 317 is from high velocity 40gr +/- cartridges. Aguila Interceptors and MiniMags both seem generally accurate as well as shot close to POA. I decided they would be my chose for personal defense based on POA and likely penetration, but I have little faith in .22LR based on the overall rimfire reliability. cCI MiniMags have been pretty reliable to light my first, but have gotten even a dud there.
 
Back
Top