DWalt
Member
I just read this. Seems that the Ukrainians used a Bradley Fighting Vehicle to take out a Russian T-90 tank, supposedly the Russian's finest tank. Watch: Russia’s most advanced tank destroyed by US Bradley fighting vehicle
Bradley takes on a Russian T-90 tank and wins
- Thread starter DWalt
- Start date
Register to hide this ad
UncleEd
Member
Met a man at a gun shop years ago who
related that his son was a crew member
on a Bradley. It was confronted by an
Iraqi tank which stopped and its crew
leapt out, surrendering.
related that his son was a crew member
on a Bradley. It was confronted by an
Iraqi tank which stopped and its crew
leapt out, surrendering.
TJm15.38
Member
That automatic 25mm cannon in the Bradley is an awesome weapon. The T-90 didn't have much of a chance.
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2006
- Messages
- 19,306
- Reaction score
- 30,222
There is also something to be said about the tank operators themselves. Training ad tactics has so much to do with which one comes out on top.
Although the Sherman Tank during WWll was so inferior to the German Panzer and Tiger Tanks, there were some vulnerable areas of the German tanks and the USGI's were taught where to hit them at the point of their weakest armament (in the rear of the tanks). In general, the Sherman was the loser, however with a crack Tank Crew, they had at least somewhat of a chance.
Although the Sherman Tank during WWll was so inferior to the German Panzer and Tiger Tanks, there were some vulnerable areas of the German tanks and the USGI's were taught where to hit them at the point of their weakest armament (in the rear of the tanks). In general, the Sherman was the loser, however with a crack Tank Crew, they had at least somewhat of a chance.
OP
DWalt
Member
It wouldn't be surprising that the Russian T-90 crew members were poorly trained and possibly illiterate conscripts whose first instinct was to flee the scene rather than fight. But it is surprising that the 25mm chain gun was so effective. What is the typical projectile type used with it in a Bradley? Maybe DU? Regarding the Sherman vs. German tanks during WWII, I think the numerical superiority of the Sherman was pivotal in achieving German defeat. Also better American aerial and artillery support of tank operations.
Last edited:
LVSteve
Member
I don't think that it necessarily did. Looking at the video I think the big bang in the first video is the reactive armor cooking off. I don't know if the gunner was trying to achieve that, but my plan on using a 25mm cannon against a MBT would be either get behind him and hope to damage the motor or fuel tank, or aim at the tracks and go for a mobility kill. Looks like they got that in the end when the tank ran out of control into the tree.
The only reason I can think of to shoot at the turret is if you think you can render the tank's vision blocks and gunsights inoperative.One thing is for sure, that tank crew were useless. I would expect any crew with the remotest clue to have returned fire at least once. Even a miss might have persuaded the Bradleys to declare vamanos. Mind you, given the apparent short range of the engagement and if the Bradleys had the element of surprise, it could be that the fire control system had been damaged in the first few moments.
Whatever the details, score one for the good guys.
Beemerguy53
Member
This is a very dramatic illustration of the value of US assistance in helping Ukraine defend itself against Putin's invaders.
It looks like the Bradley is firing depleted Uranium rounds because of the large amount of sparks when the rounds strike the tank. (The DU rounds are extremely pyrophoric when they strike metal.) Enough DU rounds in the same area just might have caused an armor failure.
Sistema1927
US Veteran
"Russia has lost 6,147 tanks since the start of the war..."
Combination of poor equipment and poorly trained and motivated crews.
Combination of poor equipment and poorly trained and motivated crews.
I have a friend that is retired infantry. He referred to Bradley's as "bullet magnets". I'm pretty sure they had not began using reactive armor during his time in which was probably 20+ years ago.
The reason you see exactly none of the much-hyped Russian T-14 Armata tanks in Ukraine is the Russians won't be able to sell any after they prove no better than T-90Ms. Exactly like the sub-par Su57 Felon that was supposed to compete with the F-22 and F-35. All 40 of them. 
Last edited:
Butchman205
Member
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2013
- Messages
- 7
- Reaction score
- 5
That’s why a couple of my government customers have a certain line in their facility, that non-essentials are ABSOLUTELY not allowed beyond.
They have marked white line, with armed guards protecting that line.
To get beyond the line, you have to have proper credentials, and will be coming through a different gate to the other side of the plant.
You cross the line in the back of the plant, you die, the end.
We once thought that was pretty wild.
In hindsight, if you can research you enemy’s armored vehicles, you can figure out how to defeat them.
COooool video
I don't think lone unsupported armor is the smartest tactical move..... remember "Fury"? I know it's just a movie.
Cooking off the reactive armor, which looks like it would have effectively "blinded" the crew, followed by a TOW should get their attention.
I don't think lone unsupported armor is the smartest tactical move..... remember "Fury"? I know it's just a movie.
Cooking off the reactive armor, which looks like it would have effectively "blinded" the crew, followed by a TOW should get their attention.
Last edited:
No. The Ukrainians never owned any T-90Ms and captured the first example from Russia in September 2022; they now have captured 27 of all T-90 variants (as of January 14, 2024). Attack On Europe: Documenting Russian Equipment Losses During The Russian Invasion Of Ukraine - Oryx
Last edited:
Similar threads
