More deer have been killed by the 30-30 to this day even if we add up all the other calibers up together the 30-30 still wins.
Well...uh...actually, if we're to be real truthful about this, Bill, and we go back several years, the .22 has probably killed more deer than the .30-30. It's close though.
Seriously though, when some self-proclaimed "gun expert" starts bad-mouthing the .30-30, I just consider the source. Obviously, these kinds of folks get most of their "knowledge" from the latest gun rag and not from practical experience.
The .30-30 has probably ridden more miles in a saddle scabbard through pine, aspen, and rugged mountain country than any other caliber that I know of. It's the gun that most ranchers have tucked in a scabbard mounted to the side panel of their Jeep, or put under the front seat of their pickup.
As mentioned before, this "lowly" cartridge has killed deer, elk, bear, and a host of other game. It's a no-nonsense cartridge. It's a working man's gun. It might not have fancy engraving on the receiver or a Circassian walnut stock, but it seems to be the go-to rifle for a heckuva lot of folks who know the mountains and backwoods of this country.
I've killed most of my deer with a .30-30. They were mule deer bucks and this was in Utah. I've hunted black bear with a .30-30 and have never felt under-gunned.
So, whenever I hear some blowhard demeaning the .30-30, I just shake my head, walk away with a smile, and figure that he probably spends more time watching the Outdoor Channel than being out in the back country himself.