My thoughts are you have a good handle on the issue.
I still can't picture that bullet, though, or the loaded round. Any chance of a pic of the Everglades next to a Sierra? or maybe the loaded round?
I compared Zero, Nosler and Sierra 185JHP's. The nose profiles and cavities are significantly different. :
![]()
Yet the OAL's differ by a maximum of only .008"
![]()
and the full-diameter (.4515") shanks are the same length (+/- .005") near as I can measure:
![]()
Seated to 1.225" for my gun, a Nosler looks like this
![]()
And seated to 1.167" looks like this ... doable, but just barely back of the break point on the ogive
![]()
Not to my liking, but it surely should not phlunk the chunk/plunk test in any chamber.
My point is, these three 185's selected at random are virtually identical. Once an OAL was selected, I'd expect to be able to load them interchangeably without adjustment. The Everglades sounds to be wildly different, but I can't see it in the pics on the website.
Sorry, I don't have any pics but the last pic at the bottom of your post looks very close to how my bullet looks seated. I did make it to the range yesterday and chronograph them under 4.6grs of bullseye and they ran at 763fps average, recoil was mild, primers looked good, fed and ejected without issue. So I think that although they're seated further than I'm use to or like, I think were on safe ground. Next I'm going to load some up at 4.8grs, 5.0grs and 5.2grs and see. I'll post results.