Captain William S. Orthman

pace40

Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2006
Messages
1,782
Reaction score
1,241
Location
PA.



Captain William S Orthman, a veteran of the Chicago Police Department, was appointed to command the United States Capitol Police in 1933. His tenure saw its share of budget crunches, fruitcakes, and presidential inaugurations.

A few relevant newspaper clippings, of the era…







And the reason for this brief foray back to the 30's ? …

pace40-albums-few-m-p-s-picture9538-layout-w-let-em.jpg



It's really not too much of a stretch to think that this little snub stood at the ready at two of FDR's inaugurations!

It's ones like this poppin' up every now and then that keep me lookin' & letterin'. :D
 
Register to hide this ad
Wonderful piece of history! Thanks.

The quote in the article about a "particular type of nut" is very telling. I was born in Washington just later in that year (1935) and the comment that: "...once had some money but have lost everything and this has got to preying on their minds. They come to the Capitol to let Congress know what is wrong with the country" gives us some perspective that this was the great depression. My father was working at the Library of Congress and was paid in mills (fractions of a cent) for each piece work that he did.

Bob
 
Bob

Thanks for the story about your Dad. Certainly puts some perspective on the era.

One thing I noticed in reading from the July 1935 article to the Jan 1937 article is increase in size of the department over that year and a half period. 61 to 150...Thats a 146% increase in the size of the force in that short time!
 
Last edited:
Mike,
Great gun.
My apology- in fumbling around to LIKE your post, I think I deleted the other likes.......
SORRY!
 
Wow, congratulations!

That sort of finding is also why I like to letter all the Smiths I end up keeping. Sadly they almost always turn out to have been shipped to a store or distributor in NYC. Most recently an import-marked Model 15 - also shipped to NYC. Sigh. Sometimes you just can't win.

Sorry to rant

Contratulations again. That is awesome!
 
I had a high school teacher who landed a patronage job as a Capitol police officer around 1960. They handed him a loaded revolver and told him to leave it in the holster. Zero training, no qualification.
 
OK...I let the previous post sit here for a couple days to see if anyone would jump on it, but since no one did, I will.

The USCP was established by an act of congress on April 29, 1828 (HR 158, 20th Congress, RG 233). Do you really think that 132 years later, at an armed federal law enforcement agency, they just handed a guy a gun and said "stand here"?

The 86th US Congress (1959-1961) had some pretty interesting members:

President of the Senate: Richard Nixon
Senate Majority Leader: Lyndon B Johnson

Misc Senators:

John F Kennedy
Jacob Javits
Hubert Humphrey
Strom Thurmond

I'm sure these guys just said, " Yea, he's cool. Go ahead and give him a gun to protect me and my family."
 
Last edited:
Awesome pictures and history lesson.

I was curious about the patronage appointments. I found this quote online purported to be from the Oxford Guide to US Government regarding patronage assignments by congress.

Assigning jobs on Capitol Hill

Even after establishing a civil service system for the executive branch, Congress continued to assign most of its own jobs according to patronage. At first this was because Congress met for only half the year and hired a small staff for only those months. Only a few committees, such as Finance, Ways and Means, Printing, and Claims, which received correspondence and other documents even after Congress had adjourned, were authorized to employ a year-round staff. Members of the House and Senate appointed their own office staffs. Sometimes members appointed their wives, children, and other relatives as their secretaries, messengers, or committee clerks. New ethics laws eventually outlawed nepotism, but members continued to appoint their campaign supporters to posts in their own offices and committees and to other jobs around the Capitol. Both parties had patronage committees to assign clerks, elevator operators, and Capitol police to their members for patronage appointments.

Patronage began to decline after World War II, as Congress began to meet on a year-round basis and as the growth in members' personal staffs relieved the pressure of making patronage appointments elsewhere. But outside of members' own offices (where staffs generally reflect the member's political leaning), the trend in the general operations of Congress has continued toward a permanent, professional, and nonpartisan staff.

Although the quote indicates these assignments declined after WWII, I found an additional news story regarding the patronage appointments.

If you google "Capitol Police Need Beef Up, Nixon Declares" you will find an article written by Dick Barnes of The Day newspaper in March 1971. Partial quotes from that article

"The 575 man force...includes scores of college students put to work with two weeks training." "...about 45% of the Capitol Police Force jobs are patronage....and about 1/3 of the patronage jobs are filled by college students."

I think it's possible his high school teacher might have known someone or worked on a political campaign.

Again, great pictures and research...I just don't think he was trolling your thread.
 
Last edited:
Not questioning patronage appointments at all. Fact of life in Washington. I'm saying that by 1960, an armed federal agency tasked with protecting the house of elected leaders of the country, did not just hand out a gun to a guy with no training requirements, however minimal they might have been. In this case, the program length was twelve weeks with 10 of those interspersed with duty assignments. But they were trained, albeit lightly by todays standards.

I did remove the troll remark but I still see no reason for the post in the first place.
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Back
Top