buckshotshorty
Member
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2009
- Messages
- 379
- Reaction score
- 298
Probably weren't fully seated,first hammer blow set them,second fired em.
I agree! I think you hit the primer on the head!

Probably weren't fully seated,first hammer blow set them,second fired em.
3 out of 110 reloads using CCI primers did not go off today. Second time they did. First time that ever happened. I'm a new reloader so I guess it happens. Still have about 500 rounds of the original batch left, most with CCI primers. I do recall buying Winchester once when they were out of CCI.
I agree. This is the case 98% of the time especially with newer reloaders (or a change in equipment)...Probably weren't fully seated,first hammer blow set them,second fired em.
Three things that cause primers to fail :
1 Not seated, a primer needs to fully bottom out to activate itself. Prolly 95% of the time
2 Light firing pin strikes, usually from a striker firing pin, or defective .
firing pin. Mebbe 4% due to modified guns.
3 Defective primer ( unusual, but it happens). Prolly less than 1% of the time.
I mistakenly loaded 9's for my Sig 226 with magnum primers (CC )and several failed to fire., the pin wasn't leaving a good impression .Something else to consider is that every hand primer I've ever seen uses a Toggle Linkage to provide the leverage need to seat even a "tight" primer. Because of this there is very distinct limit to the stroke of the hand primer. As a result a case with a deeper than normal primer pocket or a "short" drive pin in the hand primer can result in primers that aren't fully seated.
I would suggest you take note of the headstamp on the cases that misfired, because if it is an issue with a particular brand of brass you can avoid them. If you find that misfires are a continuing issue with a variety of case brands you may want to contact the manufacturer of your hand primer.
PS; in an effort to combat the misinformation and rumors that are constantly quoted as fact I can tell you that at one point I had all my S&W revolvers tuned to an 8.0 lbs DA trigger weight. At that weight both Federal and CCI Standard primers functioned with 100% reliability in Double Action. However, when I tested some Remington UMC I had a misfire rate of about 65%. So, I would not say that CCI has the hardest common primer, Remington does. As a result of this testing I now have retuned all of my S&W revolvers to a 9.0 lbs DA trigger weight.
However, I will note that CCI Magnum primers are harder than the standard pressure primers. Something I discovered when I picked up a used Dan Wesson 15-2 with an aftermarket mainspring. In that revolver the 38 specials ran fine in Double Action but when I changed to 357 Magnum with CCI550 primers 1/2 of the rounds wouldn't fire in Double Action. BTW, the Dan Wesson now has a Factory spec mainspring and a DA trigger pull I would estimate at about 13.5 lbs. On the plus side it's a very smooth trigger and with a quick even pull it's not as bad as it sounds.
Have you lightened your mainspring tension lately?
CCI primers are among the hardest in the industry. I switched to Federal primers for revolvers with lightened trigger pulls for just that reason. Failure to ignite the primer.
A lot of reloader's say...I never clean the pockets. I always clean them so no crud will stop them from seating all the way to the bottom of the pocket, easily. I just don't understand the " never clean " philosophy .
Gary
You dig up a 2 year old thread just to call people lazy?I believe it is called laziness.. IMHO