Cheapest and most effective way to kill a small drone

[YeshuaIsa53]

I'm struggling with all the drones being used everywhere. Not talking about who is using them or what they are being used for. Not talking about high-altitude military drones. Also thinking about the expensive weapons being used to drop drones.

I'm thinking 12 gauge. Slugs for the heavier ones, and buckshot for the multitudes.

Shotguns can be made for the occasion. Longer barrels with full chokes for lead. Shorter barrels with modified chokes for buckshot. Multi-barrels for shooting of drones would require a mount of some sort. I like the mobility and expense of a shotgun. Maybe bring back the old punt guns of waterfowling many moons ago.

I know six men in a duck blind can put a hurting on incoming mallards or wood duck flybys. No capacity limits.

Now I personally wouldn't deploy decoys, though I would hate to place large blinds as sitting ducks.

Heck, maybe a focused force of air to tip them.

Saw a picture today of a multi-barreled shotgun on a rooftop in Moscow, and one lone guard. Someone else is thinking buckshot.

Anyone wish to add innovative thoughts, please do. It may become a much larger problem to solve.

 

[Lee Barner]

with a good rest to brace against, a suppressed .22 will do the trick, or so I have been told. Lee

 

[Ματθιας]

Turkey loads mag and super mag. Turkey loads in a semi like a Saiga 12.

An old school punt gun might work against massed drones.

 

[Rustyt1953]

My property is covered by barrage balloons.

 

[lihpster]

A really big flyswatter.

 

[Breakaway500]

You arent suppose to shoot a "drone" by law, so I have been told. However it's open season on UFOs. I use a 12 gauge with #7.5 shot payload. They explode into cute plastic clouds. A 28 gauge will do if you feel sporting..

 

[venomballistics]

The FAA forced drone operators to register, and apply an FAA number to all our RC aircraft.

To the letter of the law, what you propose is the same as firing on a maned aircraft due to that FAA " tail number" and a relative lack of differentiation in the law.

 

[s&wchad]

Cheapest and most effective way to kill a small drone

Leave Duracell batteries in it...

 

[Alk8944]

The FAA forced drone operators to register, and apply an FAA number to all our RC aircraft.

To the letter of the law, what you propose is the same as firing on a manned aircraft due to that FAA " tail number" and a relative lack of differentiation in the law.

This is absolutely correct. Drones of greater than a certain weight are required to be registered as aircraft, just like manned airplanes of any type. The law does not differentiate between shooting at drones or any other type of aircraft. People have been prosecuted for shooting at drones already so be warned, it is a federal felony!

 

[ladder13]

Raytheon loves their method.

 

[Tom S.]

Cheapest: slingshot. Most effective: Frequency jammer.

 

[Bald1]

I thought I read somewhere that some states (Texas comes to mind) allow for shooting down drones over private property????

 

[Ivan the Butcher]

Best decoys: Life size cardboard "Girls" sunbathing! That will also draw in city PD chopters!

Ivan

 

[NYlakesider]

Cheapest: slingshot. Most effective: Frequency jammer.

If I remember correctly the Fed frowns very heavily on the use of a item like that. Serious fines and other problems!

 

[jeffrefrig]

I've always been told not to shoot bullets into the air; just shot shells. I've never seen a drone, but maybe they don't come over my part of town. I know the realtors' photographers use them now. The house for sale across the street, for example, but I didn't get to see them do it.

 

[venomballistics]

This is absolutely correct. Drones of greater than a certain weight are required to be registered as aircraft, just like manned airplanes of any type. The law does not differentiate between shooting at drones or any other type of aircraft. People have been prosecuted for shooting at drones already so be warned, it is a federal felony!

And that weight is 0.55 lbs wet.
Those under this threshold are too small to be a legitimate problem

 

[OLDSTER]

My 10ga. magnum double; already proven against a drone hovering over my rural subdivision home. Never heard from the drone pilot.

 

[tlawler]

with a good rest to brace against, a suppressed .22 will do the trick, or so I have been told. Lee

I agree with Lee's idea. A suppressed bolt .22 with a good scope off a steady rest from concealment. It's not like shooting a flying bird; they hover.

 

[Greyman50]

22 Quiets work very well as I've been told. No drone problems around here as way to many trees.

 

[Rotorhead1026]

If I remember correctly the Fed frowns very heavily on the use of a item like that. Serious fines and other problems!

This is absolutely correct. Drones of greater than a certain weight are required to be registered as aircraft, just like manned airplanes of any type. The law does not differentiate between shooting at drones or any other type of aircraft. People have been prosecuted for shooting at drones already so be warned, it is a federal felony!

Killjoys!

 

[ColbyBruce]

A friend's teenage daughter ran over a rather expensive drone with a Yamaha Rhino UTV. It was on the ground in a turn along a horse trail and it got smashed to pieces. They turned it into the game warden. I have a neighbor who has used a Hatsun (?) compressed air .25 pellet rifle to disable two drones flying over his hunting property. He claimed poachers were using the drones to chase deer off his property onto a gas line right of way.

 

[wood714]

This is absolutely correct. Drones of greater than a certain weight are required to be registered as aircraft, just like manned airplanes of any type. The law does not differentiate between shooting at drones or any other type of aircraft. People have been prosecuted for shooting at drones already so be warned, it is a federal felony!

And that weight is 0.55 lbs wet.
Those under this threshold are too small to be a legitimate problem

The technology of drones has advanced. My little DJI Mini 3 Pro has sensors so it can't hit anything in front, behind, below, or above it. It will slam into anything when flying sideways. The new 4 version has sensors to fix that.

If I loose is, I can press the return home button and it will land within 2 feet from where it took off. This also applies if the battery gets too low in the drone or controller, or if I loose satellite connection. Plus it's so quiet, I can't hear it till its around 20 feet above me.

I'm not sure what constitutes a legitimate problem, but it shoots 4K video, and the zoom and picture quality is near perfect.

 

[ColbyBruce]

My friend's daughter ran over a DJI Maverick, I think. I guess the Rhino and three teens must have weighed 1,500 pounds and proved to be more than the drone could tolerate.

 

[Doug M.]

I thought I read somewhere that some states (Texas comes to mind) allow for shooting down drones over private property????

*
All that means is that the STATE will not prosecute you. The feds still might. My distaste for the invasions of privacy that drones often create is pretty strong, and I doubt my office would file. I know a neighboring county did file on one such incident and the jury refused to convict. How much of that was related to the fact that the drone operator was from the west side of the state is an interesting question.

A friend who was a Sergeant in his SO in another state had a heck of a time with drones getting in the way of fire fighting resources; the choppers and planes use for air-drop of water and flame retardant would not fly when the drones were up. That's a BFHD, and I advocated using their issue shotgun with 00 to solve the problem. I would also charge the operator with whatever crime involves interfering with the operation. 60 days in jail might help with their attitude problem, most of which is entitled spoiled brat garbage.

In general, despite my distaste for drones and their owners, I cannot advocate shooting at them.

 

[Rudi]

I've been thinking of some type of "Bat Gun". A big air gun shooting a weighted net to bring one down. Then finish it off with an axe on the ground.

 

[glenwolde]

The military is working on it..

[ame]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xb5qMvie9sU[/ame]

 

[TIMETRIPPER]

A garden hose, if they are low enough.

John

 

[Breakaway500]

After watching that video..a believe a 12 gauge 3.5" magnum which can throw 2.25 oz of payload (BBs..#4 buckshot etc) would be quite effective at UFOs even beyond 100 yards. It's not like they have any armor on them..and #4 buckshot is 24 caliber and there is about 65 of them moving along at 1400fps out the barrel. May have to scout down a Benelli Super Black Eagle for the gun locker. Oh the possibilities..

 

[Bald1]

A friend's teenage daughter ran over a rather expensive drone with a Yamaha Rhino UTV. It was on the ground in a turn along a horse trail and it got smashed to pieces. They turned it into the game warden. I have a neighbor who has used a Hatsun (?) compressed air .25 pellet rifle to disable two drones flying over his hunting property. He claimed poachers were using the drones to chase deer off his property onto a gas line right of way.

A little off topic but this subject drives me nuts. A utility ROW is not open to the public to hunt. The utility company does not own it. They simply have a ROW. Somebody owns the property.

 

[cmj8591]

I don't bother shooting them down. My tin foil hat keeps me safe.