Colt King Cobra Target .22 .....

Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
550
Reaction score
791
Location
Pennsylvania
....anyone here have one of these ? If so what are your impressions ...fit and finish and over all quality ?
I handled one for the first time a short while ago ...someone I know has one . It's not inexpensive at around $900 but I thought it had the look of a quality handgun .
 
Register to hide this ad
I recently bought a 2" version. No complaints, good trigger both SA and DA, reasonably accurate (a 2" gun is never going to be a "Target" gun), seems well made. A good cleaning and some Ren Wax and it shined up real nice. I switched out the grips both for looks and the stockers are a little small for me.

new grips.webp
 
I recently bought a 2" version. No complaints, good trigger both SA and DA, reasonably accurate (a 2" gun is never going to be a "Target" gun), seems well made. A good cleaning and some Ren Wax and it shined up real nice. I switched out the grips both for looks and the stockers are a little small for me.

View attachment 792961
Colt surely makes good looking revolvers.

The Smiths starts to look like they were assembled from hardware store parts.

Congratulations on a fine looking revolver. I hope it shoots as good as it looks.
 
I have one I've had for a couple years. I've only had it to the range once and had a lot of misfires. Need to take it with a bunch of different ammo and see what happens. I know that there was a lot of internet chatter about this problem when they first came out. Maybe they've solved the issue by now.

IIdQyZih.jpg
 
I bought one earlier this year, the 6" model. I've shot it but not really wrung it out for accuracy checking. I want to pit it against my 617 6" but my motorcycle & yard work keeps getting in the way............... :cry:

My question is always, "Would I buy it again?" The answer is always "yes" on this one.

I want to trash the rubber grips for some better wood ones though.

For the record, I have the new models Python, King Cobra .357 & .22. I also have an older blued Python 4" but have never shot it, sadly. Have some older Official Police guns, but those aren't germane. Based on my meager experience, Colt is making better wheel guns than Smith seems to be these days. How many decades has it been since someone could say that, I wonder?

Like all guns these days (mostly), I would heavily inspect it before I paid good $$ for one. H&K would be the exception to that, IMO. Love my H&K's!
 
Mine is great! Finish, fit, action and accuracy are all top notch. I have the 4.25" barrel to match others.
 
I have a 4" that I bought a 18 m0nths back. I like the trigger on mine both double and single action. Far less stacking then I had with older pythons and diamondbacks I owned. Accuracy has been acceptable for my aging eyes, The only gripe I have is they could have put a better rear sight on gun of this price. I find its adjustability far inferior to my Smiths or older diamonbacks. Would I buy again yes I am thinking about a 2" OR 3" as I have an old 2.5" diamondback holster to fill.
 
I've had mine almost two years now and this thread reminds me I need to shoot it more. I've had nothing buy success with mine and didn't even need to really adjust the sights much. It makes a handy companion in the woods for small game and is equally at home plinking on the range or at the cabin. Having 10 rounds onboard makes it that much more fun as well. I don't mind the rubber grips either. They fill the hand, are easy to hang onto and it's a gun made for work and use.
IMG_8884.webp
IMG_8890.webp
 
I have both the 4" and then later got the 6", both are very well built and very accurate. I originally just wanted a 6" but my local gun shop could only get a 4" and I really liked it, a year later they called and had the 6" which I bought. If I could only have one I think it would be the 6" but I have both and do not regret it.
 
I have one, and I like it. It shoots fantastic. However, it's not without flaws, some of which are subjective personal opinion and some appear to be legit concerns. You may get the impression I don't like it after reading the rest of my post, but I do like it now that I have customized it and fixed issues I disliked.

For me, the transfer bar broke after only about 500 rounds fired. There is a very thin section near the little circular cutout that holds the hand spring, and it broke in that cross section. I don't know if this is very common or not, but it looks like a poor part design to me; just really thin cross section in that area. I replaced it. I also had the DA strut spring break. Not a big deal there because I decided to replace the whole hammer anyway.

Some have reported that a piece of the hammer tends to break on the little hook that holds the hammer stirrup. I can see why, as it's really thin in that cross-section too. I never had this happen because I replaced my hammer before it ever had a chance to possibly happen.

My subjective criticisms of its design are that it has a tiny hammer spur and a narrower trigger face than I would prefer, especially in a so-called "target" revolver. So to get what I want, I highly customized mine by replacing the hammer entirely and made a wider trigger shoe that I silver soldered onto the existing trigger and polished so you can't see any joints.

I bought a hammer from an old Diamondback .22. The Diamondback hammer has a nice wide, longer hammer spur that is perfect for what I want. I modified the Diamondback hammer it so it will work in the KCT .22. Geometrically the pivot hole and SA and DA sear engagement surfaces are in the exact same location as on the factory KCT hammer. So, I ground off the DB .22 hammer mounted firing pin, machined the hammer nose profile to work with the transfer bar to be exacly like the original hammer, and made a new hammer stirrup to adapt the existing mainspring style to the pinned stirrup attachment on the Diamondback hammer.

Then, I made a wider trigger shoe and silver soldered it onto the existing trigger to give the wider trigger face I wanted. I also made a new front sight that is narrower and slightly taller than the front sight that came with it and replaced the rear sight with a Wilson.

So mine is essentially a custom revolver now, though the frame, barrel and most major parts of the gun remain factory stock.

I of course voided the warranty by doing this, but I don't care because I now have it the way I want.

I never had any light strikes either before or after the mods I did, and the trigger in both SA and DA was pretty good before and now outstanding after the mods.

Despite the changes I made to mine, I still recommend the King Cobra Target .22 overall, but I have very mixed feelings about it. If you don't have the parts breakage I mentioned, I think it's a nice revolver. I don't know how common those issues are, so I can't say what kind of risk it poses.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_6607.webp
    IMG_6607.webp
    826.1 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_6590.webp
    IMG_6590.webp
    440.1 KB · Views: 0
Back
Top