Concealed Carry and Open Carry

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm not an open carry guy myself, however... A wise man changed my mind on the subject of the laws.

He pointed out that, there are many places where a lawful concealed carrier can run afoul of the law, and be arrested, should his concealed firearm become inadvertently visible. Some states allow for a momentary exposure, as in one's cover garment is raised while reaching for something in a store, or the wind blows one jacket up. But others make no such allowance.

Legalized open carry protects concealed carriers from arrest if their t-shirt rides up over their holster.

I had never thought about it that way. It changed my mind.
 
I believe also that it is location dependent. But there is an element of “use it or loose it” at play here. Why do so many people “freak out” by someone exercising a perfectly normal Constitutional right? Part of open carry is to expose the public to the idea that this is a legal ordinary right. And to educate LEOs on the fact that their job is to investigate to see if a law is being broken or a threat to public safety exists ; not to intervene and prevent the right from being exercised. A constitutional right should not be infringed because of the public’s irrational reaction or disdain for that right.

I agree that many young or inexperienced citizens open carry to show off or to provoke a reaction. I don’t generally open carry but there are times/places that I would.
 
Last edited:
To me open carrying in public is tantamount to having a large sign reading “shoot me first”. I’ll pass thank you. I do OC on my farm or while hunting, but not in other scenarios (and I’ve carried legally for the better part of 4 decades now). When I worked as a firefighter I did not routinely wear the uniform off duty either for the same reason-thought being a thug is likely to attack before reading the badge or patch. I’ve seen a few open carry folks (and it is legal here) but I much prefer they grey man approach. Why would you choose to deliberately draw hostile attention to yourself? (Not just the bad guys, but the soccer moms, Karen’s, and other folks who associate a firearm with criminal intent/thought? ). YMMV.

I prefer to avoid trouble - minding my own business while not doing anything at all as a statement works for me. I'm not sure how many bar fights I've had to respond to over the wrong team hat, the wrong t-shirt slogan, etc., but I need no such trouble in my life.
 
Last edited:
I prefer to avoid trouble - minding my own business while not doing anything at all as a statement works for me. I'm not sure how many bar fights I've had to respond to over the wrong team hat, the wrong t-shirt slogan, etc., but I need no such trouble in my life.

The problem here is that there is no “wrong hat or slogan “. The problem is that society and the judicial system has chosen to go lightly on or excuse those who start a fight over a hat or slogan and to vilify the person wearing the hat! It is one of the reasons why the RKBA is so crucial; so that no man should be attacked or imposed upon for a hat or a slogan. I personally prefer having the element of surprise. I feel that it gives me an advantage over any would-be threat. But to each his own.
 
I get the positions taken in favor of O/C. They are not "wrong", but generally have no appeal to me. I want to be unknown and gray as much as possible. I rarely dress like a lawyer. I don't have my work ID visible as it is a target tag.

In LE, I had to deal with snowflakes who had a wild emotional response to people O/C while at the grocery store. I could tell from the area code in the call data that this was going to be a western WA snowflake. He did not respond well to being told we were not going to make contact as that would be a civil rights violation. All that O/Carrier did was draw attention and make us a serious enemy. We already have too many enemies.

I also had a recent learning point at work. I have had a bunch of public records requests about alleged violations of a form of protective order. Based on my experience and education, I think they are not only BS, but that the conduct is protected speech. The respondents (defendants) are not only restrained by the order, but had to get rid of all of their guns. I looked at the petition for order and think it is weak, but during some of the arguments (neighbors and former friends) respondent was O/C. That may have been the tipping point. It is vital that one never give ammo to those who hates us. We have had laws enacted here about open carry at demonstrations because of the unwise folks who carried pistols and slung rifles.

I just saw a vid on the "Washington Gun Law" channel about an appellate argument in ... Maryland I think, that claims that the 2nd amendment must yield to the 1st because speech might be intimidated by the armed. Putting aside the intellectual weakness of the position and its reliance on "feelings", we cannot have that position take hold. WLG is run by an attorney who generally seems pretty sharp to me, and he does not restrict his vids to WA. Anyone who has an interest in legal aspects of firearms ownership and use (which should be every person who owns a gun and certain every member of this an other fora) should be aware of and watching his vids.
 
Back in the day (the 70's), one would just go to the local ER and for 45 dollars you got a short arm inspection and a shot of penicillin and your parents would never know. Or so I've been told....

Not to hijack this thread, but if I had my way it would still be that way, only free.
 
The problem here is that there is no “wrong hat or slogan “. The problem is that society and the judicial system has chosen to go lightly on or excuse those who start a fight over a hat or slogan and to vilify the person wearing the hat! It is one of the reasons why the RKBA is so crucial; so that no man should be attacked or imposed upon for a hat or a slogan. I personally prefer having the element of surprise. I feel that it gives me an advantage over any would-be threat. But to each his own.

You've missed the point. People are often irrational and unpredictable, and it takes little to start trouble that ends poorly. Open carry where it's neither normal nor expected draws attention, much of which will be negative, some of which may escalate into utterly unnecessary acrimony.

If I can walk into a grocery store and do business while attracting no attention whatsoever, my life is good.
 
Back in the day (the 70's), one would just go to the local ER and for 45 dollars you got a short arm inspection and a shot of penicillin and your parents would never know. Or so I've been told....

Speaking of parents, back in the 1960's I learned not to leave my military records on the kitchen table in between duty stations.
 
I'm as pro-gun as they come but some folks I see open carrying look like they don't have a clue and don't get me started on those $9 nylon holsters that flop around with a velcro strap over the tang!

What’s even more stupidly dangerous are people that carry their gun in a slick nylon holster with NO retaining strap.
And that applies to both inside / outside the belt carry.
 
Note. Hard core criminal/prisoners practice gun stripping.
Cowpies! Hard core criminals get elected to office.;)
Seriously, don't believe everything you hear. Prisons are not finishing schools for criminals, skinners don't have a harder time than other I/Ms, or not much, and Bubba in the cell with you isn't a frequent occurrence.
 
Cowpies! Hard core criminals get elected to office.;)
Seriously, don't believe everything you hear. Prisons are not finishing schools for criminals,

Obviously, you've never seen the prison yard surveillance videos of prisoners holding disarming/sidearm snatch classes.

OK, maybe they could have been dance classes :)
 
Last edited:
You've missed the point. People are often irrational and unpredictable, and it takes little to start trouble that ends poorly. Open carry where it's neither normal nor expected draws attention, much of which will be negative, some of which may escalate into utterly unnecessary acrimony.

If I can walk into a grocery store and do business while attracting no attention whatsoever, my life is good.

I agree with the above, be invisible. I open carry a 44 mag at my mountain home where I won’t see another person for days.
At my home in the city I carry concealed.

There are always exceptions but some people like the attention.
It’s possible that the person who is offended by your open carry is covered head to toe in ink, blue hair and 2 lbs of metal piercings.
Both are seeking attention in their own way.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top