Concealed versus open carry

Status
Not open for further replies.
Register to hide this ad
Didn't do much of a search on this topic, did you?

Have fun with it.

bob

Well yes I did actually...and came away with the facts of like the poster Below stated in part. Calling attention to yourself..becoming a primary target..losing any element of surprise ..these three alone override any supposed advantage I could imagine..of which I can't imagine any...

If you know of any would love to have you share them with me
 
Oh No, not again! I doubt this Thread will last very long.

Why didn't you do a search on your topic, it's been beaten to death many times before.
 
All you are missing (perhaps until just now) is the arguing and irritation this topic engenders here. Suffice it to say that there are a significant number of people who agree with your assessment but also a significant number who strenuously disagree. Do a search here for the topic and you will find both sides of the point have been "discussed" at length.

Just trying to keep the peace :-)
 
Well yes I did actually...and came away with the facts of like the poster Below stated in part. Calling attention to yourself..becoming a primary target..losing any element of surprise ..these three alone override any supposed advantage I could imagine..of which I can't imagine any...

If you know of any would love to have you share them with me

Why would you need any of those things if the presence of your openly carried firearm acted as a deterrent to bad things in the first place?

bob
 
Almost any benefits of open carry (and whether they are benefits or discredits is open to lengthy and opinionated argument) are benefits to the gun-toting community as a whole, not to the individual.

AFAIK, there is only one possible personal advantage of open carry, which I myself have observed (in another individual), but it is an unusual case, and not ordinarily applicable to the average citizen, or even most LEOs. I remember once seeing an individual working from an armored car, delivering cash to or receiving cash from a store. He was in uniform, his occupation was obvious, and his revolver was in a steel-shanked holster which held the butt of the revolver at about waist level, and quite a few inches (six? more?) from his body. It was clear that if he had practiced, that revolver could be in his hand VERY quickly, probably more quickly than any gun carried concealed. However, if you think about retention, you will realize that while his carry method may have been OK for him, it would not be acceptable for most people.

Hope this answers your question. Most people open carry to make a political statement, or because they want to accustom the populace to open carry, or because they already live in a place where it is not odd, and they don't want to put on another shirt or jacket.
 
Unless this is your EDC, then there could be an advantage! :eek:
Worlds-Largest-Revolver-303.jpg
 
Most people open carry to make a political statement, or because they want to accustom the populace to open carry, or because they already live in a place where it is not odd, and they don't want to put on another shirt or jacket.

I also find it a much more comfortable method of carry when compared to tossing a gun in my pocket or even inside my waistband.

I think that covers most reasons people open carry.

bob
 
Regarding armored car guards, around here they carry their handgun in their hand as the other guard carries the money. Sometimes if their load is light they both have their guns in their hands. The third guard stays in the truck.
 
open carry will only get you harrassed by police even if legal, and cause problems
with the public. I open carry if i have to go to an ATM machine at night or the machine
is located in a rough area. other than that conceal carry
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top