Twice in recent months members here, both LEOs I believe, stated that they were not supporters of the NRA because of the NRAs support of public sale of so-called "cop-killer bullets" back in the 1980s. Since this myth seems to still be abroad, I believe it deserves its own thread.
I had thought that the media's gross mis-portrayal of NRA's role as heedless of the safety of officers, and insistence on making the round available to everyone, had been roundly exposed. Apparently I am wrong.
I responded in both threads, probably too forcefully, for which I apologize.
But my gosh, people!! Can't you think for yourself? Why do you swallow obvious propaganda from sources you know are biased at best, and liars at worst? The internet has been around a while now, and, as they say, google is your friend. It doesn't take much effort to investigate all sides of an issue, and come to your own conclusion.
Short summary of the "cop-killer bullet" issue:
Someone developed a bullet that would defeat ballistic vests of the day. The media howled, invented the phrase "cop-killer bullets," and called for congressional action. Congress responded by proposing legislation that would ban any bullets that would defeat ballistic vests, including nearly every center-fire rifle caliber. NRA quickly and properly opposed the legislation. New legislation was written, with NRA input, and a law was passed that outlawed, for public purchase, the specific handgun ammo. However, the media and anti-gunners, very successfully apparently, portrayed NRA as being callous to LEO concerns, and as being a proponent of the purchase of the ammo by the general public.
If you wish to investigate this on your own, here is a good starting point.
GunCite-Gun Control: "Cop-killer" Bullets
I had thought that the media's gross mis-portrayal of NRA's role as heedless of the safety of officers, and insistence on making the round available to everyone, had been roundly exposed. Apparently I am wrong.
I responded in both threads, probably too forcefully, for which I apologize.
But my gosh, people!! Can't you think for yourself? Why do you swallow obvious propaganda from sources you know are biased at best, and liars at worst? The internet has been around a while now, and, as they say, google is your friend. It doesn't take much effort to investigate all sides of an issue, and come to your own conclusion.
Short summary of the "cop-killer bullet" issue:
Someone developed a bullet that would defeat ballistic vests of the day. The media howled, invented the phrase "cop-killer bullets," and called for congressional action. Congress responded by proposing legislation that would ban any bullets that would defeat ballistic vests, including nearly every center-fire rifle caliber. NRA quickly and properly opposed the legislation. New legislation was written, with NRA input, and a law was passed that outlawed, for public purchase, the specific handgun ammo. However, the media and anti-gunners, very successfully apparently, portrayed NRA as being callous to LEO concerns, and as being a proponent of the purchase of the ammo by the general public.
If you wish to investigate this on your own, here is a good starting point.
GunCite-Gun Control: "Cop-killer" Bullets
Last edited by a moderator: