Well if you must break a rule your own are the ones to start with :roll eyes:Vietnam 1972, a recon team who I knew, encountered a small group of NVR' s out past the perimeter. A firefight ensued. A corporal told me later that they expended at least 600 rounds. They recovered one enemy survivor. He had been hit 17 times. He eventually recovered. All this with 5.56 cartridges.
Stop somebody in seconds with a .22? I think not.
At any sign of trouble I would certainly not have a loaded .22 as the weapon closest to me.
I have broken my own rule by responding to this type of question but.........Really?
Well if you must break a rule your own are the ones to start with :roll eyes:
The question was not would you choose to or depend on, but could it be done.
NO , what I got was a toy I can't play with because of ammo hoarders & those keeping stock piles to resale, or what ever other reason you want to throw in that is keeping this shortage going long after all other ammo has come back.I bet the OP got a free "I Love walter Mitty" T-shirt with the purchase of his 15-22.![]()
Hopefully when you say, "Please don't harm my family," she will drop to the floor and he will bend his head down giving you ammo room to pleat the Perps skull off..
How far away was that target? Cause I am no sniper and I put 25 shots in a dime sized target at 50 yards with a dialed in Nikon on my 10/22. Can shoot the erasers off pencils at 25 yards no problem. Your target looks like you hit it with birdshot at 25 yards
But nice drawing. I couldn't do that
Doing such shooting from the bench is one thing; doing it in a highly stressful situation with large amounts of adrenaline dumped into the blood stream is a totally different matter.
I probably could if the distance was less than 10 yards, but I hope never to have to make that decision.
NO , what I got was a toy I can't play with because of ammo hoarders & those keeping stock piles to resale, or what ever other reason you want to throw in that is keeping this shortage going long after all other ammo has come back.
,
But the question is a valid one, it is a fire arm that could kill you.
Given trying this or throwing a rock I think I would try.
The possibility of a dead hostage is there no matter the weapon, caliber or shooter.Highly doubtful for anyone but the most highly trained sniper or high-stress trained shooter. The most probable result of even trying is a dead hostage and a dead "defender" because he didn't get an instant kill.
Just curious how much such training you have that you would declare that you could make the shot, as you did in the original post.
In Lieu of flowers just send all your friends a brick.(1) there is ammo available on line all over the place. You do have to put out a modicum of effort to get it though. I've bought several thousand rounds since the first of the year. Of course, I've shot several thousand rounds since the first of the year.
(2) These kinds of questions are generally asked by people whose shooting skills aren't nearly as good as they think they are. Where do I send the flowers when you botch the shot and the perp kills you and the hostage both?![]()
It was meant to be lighthearted, but dang they some testy folks around.This thread is a joke, right?
![]()
,Now to try to defend this and get real, I will say that if a perp is holding a hostage 10-15 ft away and I have my laser trained on his face, 1 shot would in all likelihood end it real quick. It may be a lowly 22 but a velocitor round anywhere in the face from 10 ft is going to take somebody down real quick. I don't really think one person here can argue that point at that range. We're talking somebody's face here.
Most of the time a perp can tell when you're going to make your move because you have to move to act. That's where a laser comes in. If the laser is trained on his face and your finger is on the trigger, there is nothing you have to do but slowly squeeze the trigger. There is no movement for him to observe. He can't possibly react until after he's been shot. In fact the bullet is in him before (if ever) he hears it.
This of course assumes a static situation when the perp has a weapon on the hostage, or is holding the hostage, you also have the laser trained on his face. Adrenaline or no adrenaline, holding a laser on somebody's face at 10-15ft is not that hard to do. Unless you're a real spaz.
Yes, the perp could possibly survive and kill the hostage, but they could also just shoot the hostage without warning if you do nothing. In fact I'd rather take the shot then leave my hostages fate up to some drug crazed of scared perp.
With a 22 velocitor round at 10-15 ft, I would say it will work as good as anything else. It's just a matter of how dead they need to be and how much hamburger you need to make at that point I believe.
Now to try to defend this and get real, I will say that if a perp is holding a hostage 10-15 ft away and I have my laser trained on his face, 1 shot would in all likelihood end it real quick. It may be a lowly 22 but a velocitor round anywhere in the face from 10 ft is going to take somebody down real quick. I don't really think one person here can argue that point at that range. We're talking somebody's face here.