Current No Lock J frames from S&W

I really do "need" one of those 640 Pro's. :)

Watch Grabagun...they sold the Pro for $599 today. They have been changing the price daily. $599 over the weekend, $702 two days ago...$599 today..now $699 but out of stock. They have been coming backing in stock every day or two.
 
I won't buy a Smith and Wesson revolver with a lock. Nope. No way. And I know many people who feel the same way.

Smith and Wesson is only hurting their business with their ridiculous "lawyer locks." Just once, can't the consumers win, instead of the overpaid ambulance-chasers winning? It doesn't seem like too much to ask. Choose freedom, S&W. Take off the (quasi)legal chains, S&W. It will feel so good when you do!


---------------
I agree...They are forcing me to buy my 1st Ruger after 5 Smith revolvers. Must be nice to give away the amount of business they have because of the IL.
 
Interesting, that S&W sells only "hammerless" revolvers without the IL. As noted above, that is not entirely logical! But it means S&W must have some openness to the idea of change...

IL threads tend to get locked... but I'd like to add a new thought to the discussion. What if S&W got their "Saf-T-Lock" legacy staff to design and engineer a lock with an entry port on the front strap, behind the trigger guard? Many people -- me included -- don't like the aesthetics of the IL. It could be placed mostly out of sight.

The new design could also incorporate a failsafe design. There have been few reports of IL failures, but just enough -- apparently all with light weight revolvers -- to put the dread in potential buyers. And I've looked at the mechanism, and have to admit the little spring and lever are puny.

So a better design would be one that is both more reliable and hidden. Does anyone really lock their revolver? Not many, but there are times it might be worth doing (e.g., while storing the revolver, in cases where you are really unsure who might come upon it -- kids? a non-gun person?).

Anyway, not to tempt the "lock this thread" folks, and I admit IL threads get tiresome, but if we can't get S&W to go back, maybe they can go forward, and do a better hidden lock...
 
Last edited:
Back
Top