bmcgilvray
Member
I don't care for any DAO gun, revolver included. I like having single-action capabilities. I like choices. In a self-defense situation I might "cheat" under the right circumstances.
I got news for ya'll, if you ever have the need to pull a gun in a legal self defense situation, you had damn well be planning on firing it and very quickly.
In self defense situations revolvers are meant to be shot double action only. This of course excludes SA revolvers. This isn't something new. Been that way for generations.
Actually there's more to the Alverez case than him being charged because his pistol was cocked. A lot more.Some folks here seem to have lost the original question posed by the OP. For those who claim it doesn't matter, I suggest reading State vs Luis Alverez (or the other way around, can't recall).
Speed reading version: Miami Police Officer Alverez intentionally shot a felon who was reaching for his illegal firearm. The prosecution/persecution version (after Miami burned) was that the service pistol was cocked and the resultant discharge was negligent. Alverez was acquitted. (Can't recall if Miami burned again.) Shortly thereafter, Miami turned all their revolvers into DAO. While we don't know what the Prosecutors would have done if that was done prior to the incident, it would have removed a hook for the prosecution to establish their theory of the event. Also, recall that civil cases only need preponderance of the evidence/number of kleenex prompted by the heart rending story, not beyond a reasonable doubt.
Whoever told you this has no idea what they're talking about
well whoever told you that a DA/SA pistol with a stock factory trigger is a liability has no idea what they're talking about either.![]()
That's exactly what I was saying. I was replying to OP
Actually there's more to the Alverez case than him being charged because his pistol was cocked. A lot more.
The prosecution contended that Johnson was turning around to face Alverez when Alverez shot him and that Johnson did not present a threat when he was shot. Alverez contends that Johnson was reaching for a gun when Alverez shot him.
Puts a different spin on what you quoted doesn't it. I know there are some 'defensive tactics experts' who like to use Alverez in their teachings. They use just the part that fits what they want to teach but they don't actually use the entire case. They spin it to fit what they want it to say instead of teaching what Alverez was actually about.
How about a single action revolver? Did you cock that to intimidate or because the situation existed where you reasonably believed that your next action would be to shoot?