BLACKHAWKNJ
Member
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2006
- Messages
- 6,137
- Reaction score
- 6,524
The climate has been changing since the Creation.
-11° here right now, but it's a dry cold.
Why does any one person need three polluting vehicles nevermind more?
Same reason one person needs three man-killing firearms or even more.Why does any one person need three polluting vehicles nevermind more?
Same reason one person needs three man-killing firearms or even more.
BTW, what evidence do you have that increased ICE-vehicle ownership by one person increases pollution? Does a person who owns four ICE vehicles drive more miles than a person who owns three? And how much pollution and use of unrenewable resources does an ICE vehicle cause, compared to a lithium-battery-powered vehicle?
Inquiring minds want to know.
She/he/it has not been sworn in.Ask Siri![]()
.....
Folks, you know how we view hoplophobes who argue that somehow or other, guns are responsible for violence, and who try to ignore the human element in crime because it doesn’t suit their agenda? Well, that’s exactly how legitimate scientists who have studied climate change view those who argue that human beings aren’t responsible for what’s happening to our planet.
Problem with your analogy is that there are a goodly number of legitimate scientists that see no convincing evidence of anthropogenic climate change. That aside, the supposed "solutions" climate activists provide (wind, solar,etc) wouldn't actually solve the "problem" but would drive us all into energy starvation and penury.
We've had a carbon-free energy source that can actually support a large industrial economy for 80 years.
If climate change is such a threat, where're the nukes?
Sir, if you can document, from an impartial source, that Greta Thunberg owns nine cars, I’ll donate $100 to the charity of your choice.
Folks, you know how we view hoplophobes who argue that somehow or other, guns are responsible for violence, and who try to ignore the human element in crime because it doesn’t suit their agenda? Well, that’s exactly how legitimate scientists who have studied climate change view those who argue that human beings aren’t responsible for what’s happening to our planet.
Nothing brings folks together like a climate change thread.
Problem with your analogy is that there are a goodly number of legitimate scientists that see no convincing evidence of anthropogenic climate change. That aside, the supposed "solutions" climate activists provide (wind, solar,etc) wouldn't actually solve the "problem" but would drive us all into energy starvation and penury.
We've had a carbon-free energy source that can actually support a large industrial economy for 80 years.
If climate change is such a threat, where're the nukes?
A few minutes’ worth of Googling can be very enlightening. I trust NASA and the National Geographic Society…I can’t find any reason for them to grind an axe on climate change one way or the other. Organizations preaching climate change denial are usually so nakedly political that linking to them here will likely violate The Rules.
Believe what you want.
Home – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet