Decisions

Classics vs "Classics"

Well, I also prefer the classic and nostalgic P&R N-frame revolvers like the original .44 Magnums and the Model 29-2s. Why? The hand fitting, the timing and smoothness, the accuracy, the beautiful bluing (or nickel), the wood stocks, yada yada yada. Then again, if you look at a thread a little further up in this sub-Forum, you'll see the thread that says:
"Classic M19 review Gunblue490".

Listen to what Gunblue490 says about the new S&W Classic revolvers (in this case, the Model 19-9). He makes some very valid points about how S&W has actually improved their revolvers with the new Classic series and made them more dependable with less chance of damaging parts over time. Machining is precise, bluing is very nice, stocks are well made and attractive. Will these new Classics (complete with internal lock) replace my love for the vintage S&W revolvers...emphatically NO! However, if you're going to put a bunch of full power loads through a S&W revolver, or take it into the woods, why not eliminate the risk of damaging a valuable and possibly irreplaceable piece and consider buying and shooting a new Classic instead. You still get the beauty and craftsmanship of a fine S&W revolver without the risk of damage, and at a reasonable price. Just sayin'...classic vs "Classic".
 
When I made your decision, I got two. An unfired new in the box blued Model 29 no dash with coke stocks to admire and an excellent condition nickel Model 29-2 with a 4" barrel to shoot.



Now you need a Dirty Harry .44 Magnum to make your collection more complete.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top