Detonics Combat Master

Mainsail

Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2015
Messages
1,440
Reaction score
2,801
City & State/Province
On someone's last nerve..
I was trolling some of the state auctions and found a property room auction happening down in Texas. There were at least 30 guns, all looking pretty bad. The listings all said they were stored in a non climate controlled area. Many of the rifles had some bad surface rust on the barrels, the internals were a complete unknown.

Of the handguns I wanted to bid on, there was a S&W model 19 and 66 among others. There was an old Dan Wesson 15 that could probably be refurbished. There was a FireStar I considered (sold under $100) and something I never heard of, a 10mm MegaStar.

But this was the one I wanted; the Detonics Combat Master from Seattle. It's one of my 'always wanted' guns that I highly desire, but would never pay their current market price to get. So it was always on my list to wait for a good deal or better.

I'm very excited to have won it at $300. It'll probably take a couple weeks to ship it in, but man I can't wait to get my hands on it!

Looks like one magazine, and since it's stainless I'm hoping it will only need a deep cleaning to bring it back. Someone pointed out the hammer doesn't look original, so I've ordered one from Numerich along with a couple magazines.

These were the photos I had to go with, not much in the way of description other than they were used guns stored poorly.

attachment.php


attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • Det1a.jpg
    Det1a.jpg
    64.1 KB
  • det2.jpg
    det2.jpg
    23.9 KB
Thanks!

If, after an initial inspection reveals no send-it-out deficiencies, I plan to detail strip it and let it soak in.... something. Better living through chemistry?

Suggestions?
 
Probably be better to have it bead blasted. I don't believe the pitting (if there is pitting) and stains will come out by soaking. Silica sand can also be used, as it is more "rounded" or orbital in shape (60 mesh) like the glass beads, rather than having sharp edges like some particles.
 
Last edited:
Nice score! It should clean up just fine.

I believe the hammer is original. There were a number of different hammers used over the years, including the "J", a wedge shape and a Commander style. Your is a later production original Detonics and probably dates to around 1980. The CR serial number prefix indicates stainless steel (C = carbon steel). Jerry Ahern resurrected the brand around 2005, but they didn't survive very long.

Here's a relatively early Combatmaster with the "J" hammer and a hard chrome finish.

attachment.php


attachment.php


Original magazines are not difficult to find and are quite distinct. The floorplate is marked Detonics .45 ACP and has a gap at the back, where an extension on the rear of the follower projects through and acts as a loaded magazine indicator. You'll want to sit down before you start looking for originals online, they can top $200. New Detonics mag's for the Combatmaster are marked differently (New Detonics logo) and should work just fine. I sold several a few years ago for about $50 each.

Nice pistols. Never could figure out why the put the rear sight so far forward while starting out with the short sight radius. I'm sure they had their. reason.
According to the owner's manual, the sight was moved forward and the "top rear of the slide was sloped to allow fast smooth cocking of the hammer". There's no grip safety on these and some people preferred to carry them with the hammer down on a loaded chamber. They are safe to carry cocked and locked, especially if the holster has a retaining strap that goes between the frame and hammer! ;)
 

Attachments

  • 000_1643.jpg
    000_1643.jpg
    132.4 KB
  • 000_1640.jpg
    000_1640.jpg
    116 KB
Last edited:
A Scotchbrite pad should remove any lingering stains...just make all rubs in the same direction.
 
Congrats for your new gun!I've always loved the Detonics.One of my friends has one;I made sure he knows I'm first in line to buy it when he will get bored and sell it.
By the way he uses it,something's telling me I'm in for a looooong wait!
 
You may already know this, but Don Johnson (Sonny Crockett) carried a Detonics Combatmaster in an ankle holster on the final years of Miami Vice.

I suspect one of his calf muscles was substantially larger than the other! :D
The only time he wore it was when it needed to appear in the scene. The rest of the time it was in the property room. ;)
 
A buddy of mine bought one when they came out. I never shot it very well, due in part to the short sight radius.

The story I heard was that some Israeli operatives had input into the slide design. And the rest of the story is the same; designed to be carried hammer down on a loaded chamber.
 
Great pick up. I've had mine for a long time. It was my car travel/edc gun before conceal carry was really a thing. Accurate at self defense ranges. Bought it from my cousin and I grew tired of the finish he had on it so I had it Cerakoted a few years ago, Sarge made some Zebrawood grips for me. Eats Winchester SilverTips like candy. Before and after pics. It is not a pistol for the faint of heart.
 

Attachments

  • Detonics Short Grip.jpg
    Detonics Short Grip.jpg
    63.5 KB
  • Detonics Combat Master (2).jpg
    Detonics Combat Master (2).jpg
    38.3 KB
Many years ago, a coworker bought a new Detonics Combat Master. As a died-in-the-wool Colt guy at the time, I expected the worst from his new pistol. I was wrong. The gun was 100% reliable with whatever ammo we were using that day. And shooting carefully as possible from the bench, was surprisingly accurate at 25 yards.

Enjoy your new Combat Master. Were it mine though, after initial function testing, I would detail strip and bead blast it. If you bead blast it properly, it will come out looking brand new. I have a blast cabinet and have done several of my guns over the years. Brownells 270+ glass beads leave a very bright result, while the Harbor freight #80 glass beads will leave a similar, but slightly more matte finish...

Jerry Ahern's Survivalist series were the first books of that type I can recall reading. Thoroughly enjoyed them at the time.
 
Jerry Ahren also offered a line of rough-out leather holster and had a book titled CCW: Carrying Concealed Weapons.

Back when I was actively teaching CPL classes, I offered his book, his IWB and Pocket holsters for a 2” J frame and his ammo wallet to my students.

He was quite a character! I still have some of his leather goods stashed away and they were a good value for the money.

Ahern holsters at 6 O’Clock:

attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • C48A4A18-0F9A-4892-9BBE-1392CAE89192.jpeg
    C48A4A18-0F9A-4892-9BBE-1392CAE89192.jpeg
    87.5 KB
Stopped by the FFL and got the paperworks going.

Took a few pics that I don't feel like processing right now, but I did these two.

In the first pic I noticed something; looks like the rear sight is in backwards? Not sure, found a pic of another one with the same orientation.

Second pic is just a look down the business end.

Needs a good cleaning but everything appears to be functional.
 

Attachments

  • Detonics01.jpg
    Detonics01.jpg
    67.7 KB
  • Detonics02.jpg
    Detonics02.jpg
    66.7 KB
Last edited:
No expert on Detonics, but that rear sight looks fine. The part facing you when shooting should be flat. All my semi-autos with fixed sights are oriented similarly.
 
What a highly collectable find! Congratulations, as you probably already know, that gun paved the way for all reliable Officers sized and smaller 45 autos (according to Ian at Forgotten Collectables).
I would imagine it's worth substantially more than what you paid for it if all you do is clean it up, whatever you do don't refinish it as some have advised here.
 
Last edited:
I'm not even sure what finish one would apply to a stainless gun. My FFL says he can bead-blast the finish back to new, but I'm only worried that might fade the already dim rollmark?

I may send it off to a 1911 expert if I can find one- during my very short inspection while I was filling out paperwork I noticed a tiny bit of movement of the business end of the barrel and some tiny up/down movement of that end of the slide in the rails. Not sure how tight these are supposed to be since I've never owned one.

EDIT to add: The final tally after the winning bid, auction fees, FFL fees, sales tax, and shipping (empty box to Texas and return box to the FFL) was $430 more or less.
 
Last edited:
I'm not even sure what finish one would apply to a stainless gun. My FFL says he can bead-blast the finish back to new, but I'm only worried that might fade the already dim rollmark?

I may send it off to a 1911 expert if I can find one- during my very short inspection while I was filling out paperwork I noticed a tiny bit of movement of the business end of the barrel and some tiny up/down movement of that end of the slide in the rails. Not sure how tight these are supposed to be since I've never owned one.

EDIT to add: The final tally after the winning bid, auction fees, FFL fees, sales tax, and shipping (empty box to Texas and return box to the FFL) was $430 more or less.
These are quite old and very collectable. Because of its age all bets are off when it comes to the lose tolerances, true that new high end 1911's are extremely tight. That wasn't the case when these were made, keep in mind they were trying to develop a compact 45acp that would reliably and consistently chamber the 45acp in such a short platform; something nobody had been able to accomplish at that point. Let me know if you're interested in selling it, as long as you don't touch the finish other than cleaning it up, that's a safe queen.
 
Last edited:
The magazines, hammer, and grips I ordered from Numrich came in.

The mags appear to be new factory, at least they're stamped Detonics on the base plate. I ordered the other three they had in stock, so wiped those out.

The hammer looks new.

The grip panels are new.
 
You got yourself an excellent piece of .45 history right there. I was fortunate to come across one years back for the right deal, although maybe not as good as yours. It was blued and was showing lots of neglect, so I had it zipped down to Robbie Barkman for the Robar NP3 coating. When I was doing a fair bit of surveillance work, it rode as backup (although would've been first to get to) in an Andrews crossdraw set up. Being seated most of the time, this was comforting as I could get a firing grip on it without moving around too much and looking normal. It was for when the street snoopers got a little close for comfort. It was a reliable and comforting piece of steel.

One way around the magazine price issue, is to make your back up magazines the slim base pad Wilson officers model mags. When I put those in, they only stick below the grip about 1/4-1/2" or so and are 100% reliable in that compact blaster.

Be sure to post pics when you get it "put back together" with your parts.
 
Had to settle for Colt Officer instead of a Detonics 45. Sounds like there's a couple Detonics owners here and you might want to follow their advice not to make any changes that arn't reversable. That includes refinishing bead blasting etc. Highly collectable firearm. Good move grabbing mags etc from GPC while they had them.
 
Detonics

My dad traded into one of these about ten years ago, and had about $300 in it. It cleaned up very nicely, and we both were interested in shooting it after all of those Ahern articles over the years.

As a disclaimer, dad was a marksmanship instructor in the Army and SF, and I grew up with a 1911 in my hand. We have experience with 45s down to the size of the lightweight Kimber Ultra Carry.

The Detonics shot miserably. Not the trigger or accuracy, but the nasty recoil. No idea why it kicked so hard, as the Ultra Carry is a *****cat by comparison. LW Commanders, and Officer's Model are softies too. That Detonics kicked like a 2"x4" slapping your palm. The only thing we can guess is that the recoil springing back then was in its infancy compared to modern mini-45s.

I think I would avoid trying to tighten one up. Apparently, one huge issue when 1911s are cut down short is the angle of the barrel gets relatively extreme in recoil, and fouls up John Browning's original geometry. That play you feel may be needed for reliable operation. Just a thought.

To the OP, I do hope that yours works out super for you. That said, it might be wiser to pick something more modern in a cut-down 1911 for carry. I am not suggesting Kimber, as I believe there are other manufacturers that make better products and have vastly better customer service.

Best wishes, Marc
 
Back
Top