photoman
Member
Bottom line is... The S&W customer service rep screwed up big time by promising and/or implying that the gun would be fixed for free. I say we tar and feather him! 

Good comments all. Lessons learned on my part about what I should and shouldn't expect from the manufacturer and the old axiom of buyer be ware is also true.
Like I said, I asked they answered and I paid, I will still buy pre-ILS S&W snubbie's when I see them.
My only comment about the discussion is the tenancy of some responses to get personal; I am a big boy and have been places in my life that would make John Wayne whine without a whimper...just put my head down and soldiered. We should all look in the mirror before we let our emotions force us across the rules of engagement line that moves a conversation from civil to personal.
Thanks again.
I know my replies make me sound like a jerk but I stand by them all the same. Principles. They can make a guy sound rougher than he really is. Honestly I feel for anyone that buys a gun that turns out to be bum. I have had pretty good luck so far. I even bought a parts gun that after cleaning out the oil caked goo it turned out to be my favorite Ruger 10/22. Maybe I need to work on having some better tact and respect when I'm typing. But some issues are an insta-anger inducer. Like the all Taurus is junk type threads. I try to avoid those like the plague. Or the Ruger's are bottom shelf. Or the Sigma's suck. Or the ILS/MIM. Or maybe I should have a blood pressure monitor installed to the keyboard that disables the keys if the BP goes too high…
If you buy something new shouldn't it work right out of the box? With the lack of a return policy on a firearm shouldn't the factory/manufacture make it right? Even if the thing is/was thirty years old it's still called S&W and consumer policy states a company buys all debts, warranties, and future profits when buying out or into a company unless otherwise stated. I'm surprised allot of you guys tell the poster to eat the cost when in fact if it was one of our guns we would want the factory to do us right. The $80. is not unreasonable if you factor in what shipping costs are these days, but this is about principle and them backing up what's in writing on a NEW gun. Keep in mind this is an American multi-million dollar company that specializes in fixing/repairing their own recent products. If it were me I would of used what the rep told me over the phone when sending me a return label and I would get it fixed for FREE. YOU all should know once a company starts charging to fix what was once free the price will eventually go up and it will eventually be charged to everyone. If this company is in fear that it's repair overhead will hurt their bottom-line then perhaps they should focus on the quality of their current products.![]()
OK, I will try to answer the questions that I know....I have already stated that there is no way the tell if the gun is new and even said that it is more than likely not.
I really don't believe it was fired outside of the factory; there is absolutely no evidence that I can find around the firing pin port, the cylinder walls or the cylinder face (it is a nickle plated gun and generally any cleaning of the veracity it would take to remove evidence of use would show in the finish).
I paid $535.00 for the gun complete with mint box and all documentation including the warranty card.
In my conversation with S&W we discussed the age and condition of the gun before they sent the email saying they would " make it right, we stand behind our work". They did pay for shipping to them but I am paying return shipping.
Once I was told there would be a charge I discussed the issue with S&W and told them that they had inspected the gun and it was clearly in as new condition and that the malfunction was a manufacturing defect; they agreed with that assessment by saying "I sympathize with your situation but the company policy is that the life time warranty policy was not put into affect until 1989".
That is what I know; the reason that I did not respond to these questions is because they do not seem relevant to the subjective question of "what do you think"? I already know that the objective answer is S&W is not obligated to fix the gun under warranty as being correct.
Once I was told there would be a charge I discussed the issue with S&W and told them that they had inspected the gun and it was clearly in as new condition and that the malfunction was a manufacturing defect; they agreed with that assessment by saying "I sympathize with your situation but the company policy is that the life time warranty policy was not put into affect until 1989".
.
With history-pride-quality behind S&W, one of the most prestigious names in the gun industry (I'm not sure any more): all this for $83.00. Please, don't say if they did this to every Tom-Dick-or Harry, the balance sheet will go out of kilter. If the OP places this on other gun forums, the PR damage will far out-weigh the cost of doing right to this revolver. Did some of you not read what they said: "They admit to the FAULT: this was a factory problem that should never have happened" FIX IT: Free....
We live in a society of the common law, that can deviate from any strict interpretation of a contractual dispute. FIX IT: FREE!
An interesting 8 page read ...
Note to turbo ... Of the two pistols you mentioned, I suggest purchasing the latter as it is still covered under S&W warranty.![]()